Please unambiguously explain to me why you don't want to die.
Because if I am dead, I can't experience the world anymore.
Again with the mind/body confusion. At least your statement makes sense for every definition of "I":
Because if my body is dead, my body can't experience the world anymore.
Because if my mind is gone, my mind can't experience the world anymore.
I totally agree to both these things, and they're kinda obvious. But here's what's tripping you up:
Because if my body is dead, my mind can't experience the world anymore.
This is what you think, based on equivocation of body and mind. It's intuitive, since the real world currently works this way. BUT, this scenario makes an exception, wherein your mind can live on long after your original body is dead. The only reason you are arguing against getting those $10 is because you are uncomfortable with these unfamiliar thoughts, and you would gladly pay $10 for peace of mind.
So people with dementia don't posses minds?
If there somehow was a person with absolute complete dementia, they would have no memories, therefore empty minds.
Mind: Set of memories.
if this is the case, then you can already immortalize yourself by creating a computer program that responds to outside stimulus using your existing experiences. So go ahead and do that then kill yourself and give the computer 10 bucks, good luck.
Why would I want to kill a perfectly good copy of myself if I can avoid that?
Why would you believe that the world does not exist outside your cognitive capabilities? If you are already going to believe in a personally unverifiable assumption, then why not believe in what the evidence tells you, namely that the world has existed for some billion years already? Now you'll probably want to change your statement to:
ahh but you see my friend, the world has existed, the universe has existed, for immemorial. It is all meaningless. It may have well not existed because for all that time, all those trillions of years we were unborn and in darkness. There is nothing the world can give us. It may have well not been there until we were born.
Great job, you discovered that your existence is meaningless if you don't give yourselves personal goals. If your goal is to understand how the world works, you should probably go with the evidence.
Here's a further question: Assume you were disassembled and subsequently rebuilt with all the same particles in the exact same configuration. Would "you" still be "you"?
no, i believe you permanently died when the cells in your brain cannot function. Disassembling at the molecular level destroys the brain. Re-assembly creates a entirely new one.
Good. Now imagine that all the particles that you are made of are
simultaneously and
instantaneously replaced by other particles of the same kind. Would that kill you?
he is the same person, his personality and behavior changed slightly due to the addition of new memories and experience. This is where your logic fails, and mines seems more rational.
Even though I disagree with him I can see where the logic makes sense, if the only difference between the clone and myself was a few seconds of memory you could argue that as the clone is a different person the original would be a different person as well as the original has a few more seconds of memory that the you from a few seconds ago.
This is really getting down to something we cannot prove either way, even if we had the technology to do this it would be impossible to prove as the clone would have memories of being that person and therefore to an outside onlooker or even to the clone itself it would still be the same person in their eyes.
My sentiment is that since we can't prove it either way, we don't need to care about it.
Poll
10 (17.9%)
Author
Topic: Consciousness and brain transfers (Read 14133 times)