Also Bran seems like a such a weird choice. Yeah he's the last of the male Starks but he also has/had zero interest in ruling. A monarch that isn't even human and spends half their time living in the past AND knows the future is maybe a way to avoid power-hungry, internecine warfare between houses......but he's just as likely to wheel himself off stage right at any moment for his own inscrutable reasons. Not exactly a monarch you can love. Bran always felt outside of the game because his real concern was the White Walkers; the Game of Thrones was a huge distraction from the actual main problem facing the world. To put him in charge of it all after it's all said and done feels like....a nonsensical choice that doesn't have any consequences? You put Jon or Gendry or any of the others on the Throne, there will probably be issues. Ignorance of what it means to rule, passions overriding what's best for the realm, old grievances, etc...because those two are actual people. Bran isn't really a person anymore and hasn't been for a while. He's been an omniscient plot device since like Season 6, with very little to say and even less to do.
It's like it was a game of musical thrones and, once they'd decided how each character gets the ending that probably pleases the most fans.....the only one left...uh.....sitting was Bran, and they were like "Yeah, this choice means there will be zero lingering questions at the end, because Bran has zero baggage left after the death of the NK. *high five* Time to move on and make something else mediocre."