Sorry, unplanned dinner with the in-laws. Not as much time on this as I wanted but I might as well go ahead and ship it.
ZU are you deliberately spewing misinformation? I think it's pretty clear that the 'demons' the Inquisitors are referring to are the Witches or magical entities in general. If you're Tiruin's counterpart then what is your wincon? Also, heard of Occam's Razor? What makes more sense: a witch-killing flavourcop death shaman, or a witch-killing flavourcop Inquisitor exactly like the previous two witches games?
Since I didn't get to this yesterday: There are two big things about this that are bothering me, and the posts following this one didn't do anything to dispel my concerns. The first is that you seem to be playing very fast and loose with the facts in your accusations, and the second is that you've taken a very hostile stance which isn't exactly giving me a lot of confidence.
ZU didn't 'spew misinformation' (not there, anyway), he gave his opinion that there might be another hostile party. And agree with him or not (I don't, personally), you should try to figure out why he thinks that or convince him why he's wrong instead of just browbeating the poor bastard, right?
Honest question, NQT: Why do you think you're still alive?
Well of course I've asked myself that as well. Maybe Dariush was telling the truth and the witches don't have a kill and whoever's killing is working on some other criterion. Maybe there's a doctor. I guess we'll find out when the game ends. Why do you think I haven't been killed yet? Why were you even voting for Lenglon?
I think there's two main possibilities. The first is simply that you are the Shaman, and requires no explanation. The second is that the Shaman finds you useful, which isn't that far-fetched: Life Shaman was already ID'd N1, and with 3 Witches and only 1 DS the math is pretty favorable. I don't know how a Doc could possibly save you from magic, and the "friendly" magic-user is dead.
I voted Leng because she said some things that
did appear to be factually incorrect, then
refused to answer any questions about it.Convince me why that's a good idea given that I think you're most likely malicious. I've pressured people on the relevant bits and rest assured I'll reread them and ask more questions if I see anything I didn't spot before. I didn't want to claim who I've already investigated as the uncertainty gives me greater bargaining power in accusations.
Because if you can provide your inspect results for each night, and it can be confirmed with a fair degree of certainty, then your actions are accounted for. And if your actions are accounted for, then you (probably) couldn't have been murdering people.
First, I still maintain my vote on Hapah.
Can you link your reasoning, please?
Seller.
Seriously? Not 'Peddler' or 'Merchant' or something a little more robust than seller?
If you were 1-sided lovers with Tir, why on earth would she ward Toony D1?
-snip- Can you not just make things up please. Also, you never said your wincon. You've admitted to being third-party, so what do you want out of this game?
Link? (PPE: Nevermind you went at it in the next post. He never directly claimed 3rd party, though, and I don't think it's at all uncommon for Lovers to be town.)
Also, you know what I am so stop pissing around and vote someone genuinely malicious.
And how would he know that you aren't malicious? We can't just start trusting you unquestionably because you started throwing your weight around, can we?
Hapah— where were you on the evenings preceding the witch hunt?
I've got a PM in to clarify, but I'll give you a PFP tomorrow as soon as I know.
On the sheer fact there's literally nobody else the last witch can be. Process of elimination and all that. Their subpar play helps too.
Where did Birdy get cleared? (Also
ouch. I hope my worries get vindicated in the post-game).