Tiruin:
Do I need to draw you a picture?
I was fully intending to do so, but came up completely empty on artistic inspiration. Alas.
In any case, I will address your asinine questions. Anything to do with NQT should be covered in my response to him below.
"You suspected he was mafia, on what basis? I stated it was elusive due to your points on Cado's case. Your points were outlined, and you being defensive really tips me off that they weren't as sincere as I first thought."
Your notes on him being anti-town along with what you accuse him of are evident in the way on how you define him without giving him any say on those points.
I get annoyed when I'm asked to repeat myself endlessly.
I'm unsure if I typed this out before, but the list that you spoilered was purely on him not wanting to claim his house #, and it was clarified by the reason of 'scum will target me.' That makes a lot more sense when you can't leave your house, huh.
If he didn't want scum attention, he shouldn't have claimed at all. If he did want to be visited, he should have claimed his house straight away. If he had done either of those things, he would not have attracted my suspicion. His claim was presented in a very scummy manner.
Because I'm not seeing the difference in viewpoints here judging by the reluctance on house # claiming based purely on the simpler case of 'so I can wincon.'
Which was a crucial part of your case, right?
Explain this to me: What benefit did Ranger have in claiming his wincon
without claiming his house number? All I can see coming from it is either "Don't lynch me I'm not scum" or "I'm not town so that's why I'm not hunting."
NQT:
"Toaster-san, legitimately what is your case for my expulsion?
You're not hunting scum.
Let's review:
Also, you speak about me not contributing but, for instance, your last message conveyed almost no information: you chatted a bit with Ford-san, asked the senpai a question, said you couldn't deal with Tiruin-sama, and then blustered for a bit about my defense.
Deflection.
Do I look like a bully?
Yes.
Have I been acting like a bully?
Yes.
More so than anyone else?
Yes.
In a word, no.
Somehow you seem to have gotten it in your head that this is up to you to decide. See
here for another example.
I've been slightly absent from proceedings and to make up I've tried to offer information useful to my schoolmates.
Here's the thing; there's a name for this. It's Information Instead of Analysis, and it's scummy. It's a form of active lurking where you post information (that's either publicly available or unhelpful) and pass that off as contributing. It doesn't help, and it only serves to mask your lack of helpfulness.
And you know that, you're just being lazy (or you yourself are a bully)."
Kiss my ass.
"I voted Dariush-yogisha before because he spent his whole time moaning about Soli-chan's charming pictures rather than actually searching for bullies.
I'm voting you because you're spending your time spinning excuses and loudly proclaiming your townhood rather than actually searching for bullies.
Let's look at your first post of the day:
Small Claims
Student #[NQT] wakes with a start from a sneaky snooze beneath a book.
"Oh! There were some things I wanted to say. POTL-san was Cool Boots-chan (the one I talked about yesterday) and lived in house 1. I was redirected there on night one.
"Miss Leafsnail-san, I went to your house last night and it was FUCKING TERRIFYING. Explanations please."
Okay, great, you've claimed this. Where are you conclusions? How has this helped you find scum? I say you're using this as a shield to hide yourself from actual hunting.
NQT: You are lurky as hell and totally noncommittal, though. Why don't you give us some suspects?
"Well, Toaster-san, I think Leafsnail-san is, if not a bully, then a possibly-not-benign third-party, so there's that. More suspicions to follow as I step up my investigatory efforts!"
This is not a conclusion. This is an extremely non-committal hypothesis. You're distancing yourself from saying anyone is scum.
"Deathsword-san, I note that you've been on 100% of the expulsions of non-bullies so far. Why should anyone trust your judgment when the vast majority of the school could tell that, for instance, Ranger-kun was obviously not a bully?"
This one is godawful. First, that's not a scumtell, especially when the sample size is two. People can be wrong. Second, the second sentence is simply stupid. If the "vast majority" didn't think he was scum, why was he lynched? You're simply inventing a case on Deathsword, here.
Dariush: While I agree that NQT is scum, that was quite the bandwagon vote there. What makes NQT more scummy than Birdy to you now?
Birdy: Eagerly awaiting your expanded read.