PFP Argh headaches and work. Unvote due to lack of response. When does day end?..And by that, what time in UTC/GMT is Toony's day end time? Would be back later to get that re-read going.
ToasterYour post here really comes off as twisting words (or..something along those lines. I'm checking your intention, and there seems to be something wrong in that approach that I can't pinpoint).
Believe it? I'm watching you do it.
Because he's anti-town, as in his interests are against the town. Even if he's telling 100% truth, his interest in town only lies in a single male townie finding his way to his doorstep- he has no true investment in scum hunting.
> No true investment in scumhunting? Whatever happened to your own principles regarding scumhunting, huh? If there's a threat, then that threat will always be a priority, something I see Ranger is still trying to achieve despite flailing around on his case--which is a defensive reaction in communication, but not altogether categorized under negative communication. Yea, the only objectives I see are him either following up on his claim of Town Boy Must Meet Me, but whether or not he did claim his house number is still up to said TOwn Boy choosing to meet him there. He can't move from his house, as he said, but he can act--which forwards my idea of Ability use being tied with not being in transit and being in your own house.
Scum are still a threat to him as they are for his objective, so I'm quite wondering how he has
no true investment present.
> He has damned himself given that case. Nobody can choose to go to said house, and he'll be left hanging. The fact that people want to lynch him (which speaks of a WASTED LYNCH) forwards that fact, and you seem to be prodding that notion in a twisted way, going along the lines of setting up a springboard on those who may be defending his case based on what facts are present on ground of 'defending.' Something I'd like to question as you see people (specifically me) as scumbuddies with him.
The question which you missed was stated here.I take it you're not seeing my context on him when you accuse me of 'defending'?
due to me seeing that with all my posts, it would be rather obvious of what I was trying to say (and that you're the first to state that I'm defending him as compared to the rest on his case and all)
How the hell would his flipping scum prove anything other than he's a lying liar who lies a lot?
I can sense by wording and in judging from his previous posts that he isn't just wasting time in lying lying lying and fluffing the thread with his words as there's quite a fine line between accusing, evading, deflecting and lying. From that line, I find it unrealistic, in any form or way, for someone to just puff out a claim like that out of thin air when nobody currently has stated anything against Ranger (vote or otherwise) and then for him to flip up in his own claim/case on something which is totally related to the claim: house number. How he proceeded onwards at the point puts him in my eye as a newbie, especially since he's being quite frank about everything. The fear of scum targeting him (which, IMO, would hardly be an excuse scum themselves would use when caught in that situation) seems like the simplest idea. He doesn't stand on the notion of post-school/pre-house visits, hence me concluding that.
This doesn't answer my question at all. What relevance does this have to attacking house number as opposed to player?
That does answer your question, at all. But perhaps my answer isn't what you were expecting, huh. I answered to the notion of what him flipping scum would prove in a cause-effect basis. If he flips scum, his posts would be something to read over, and that's my checking on his posts beforehand.
Though, I see my wording must've choked.
I find it unrealistic, in any form or way, for someone to just puff out a claim like that out of thin air
Means that I'm against him being a lying liar (and thus, disbelieving everything he says) due to how absurd the plan seems to be. Why would scum make up such a claim as that, faff around with the numerical equivalent of 'Where am I' and then...get to that point?
That is also the question that you haven't answered. The hypothetical situation.
The hesitation seems to be the defining characteristic of most cases on him. Next is, you advocate a lynch on Ranger yet all I see in your past posts is a facade of aggression, along with the obstinacy of an opinion--something you're not backing up given how you word it. You're quite convinced: Why? What posts led you there?
Why do I need to quote something that bloody obvious? Hell, you admit you see it as well? [1]
I do admit to seeing it, however you need to quote it because I think we've a misunderstanding on the minute aspects of what we're seeing. We've different PoV's, I'd like to remind you, and what you're pointing at with that bloody question is something I'm
not specifying. It was a vague question to my general inquisition.
You're quite convinced: Why? What posts led you there?
> No quotes. States it's bloody obvious. Evades with appealing to my PoV, which is quite weird given how you're being so pointed with it.
I think you need to reasses your definition of the word "confirmed."
So what's your case on him? What makes him non-third party?
Oh no, don't you dodge that. I'm not ruling out him being third party, but you have zero grounds to confirm him as non-mafia.
Tiruin gives a blank stare."That is a statement, not a question."How am I theoretically dodging anything there? You state that I need to reconfigure my 'confirmation', and yet there are points which you miss in regard to quoting on Ranger which disables my confirmation. I have grounds to confirm him--yet that confirmation is in
my own viewpoint--as I've no evidence based on moderator claim or fact. What my confirmation is, is due to what I've been prodding and poking around on Ranger.
[Last parts]
While, yes, I do agree with the hesitation and that weird turn there when Dar asked did strike as suspicious to me, it's in how the essence of his other posts strike me that changes the view of 'Total faffing mafia' to 'Weird flailing non-mafia'.
Extend.
ZU"I love how you piggyback onto accusations without quoting your own case."Tiruin brings out a black book and traces your words.Yeah. Your claim doesn't match up to your actions at all, your reasons for not wanting to claim your house number doesn't make any sense, Dariush is totally not tunneling even though everyone says he is, the argument "you should also scumhunt other people" can apply to anyone, including yourself. Also your flavor-claim feels like total BS.
Solifuge is playing???
This looks very forced.
"Firstly, the last statement seems like a blank prod on Ranger's own statement. How is that 'very' forced, and how is it forced at all? What does that imply?
"Nextly, you're stating in declarative. How does it not match up for you? How do his reasons not make sense? Why're you countering his statement on Dar's tunneling when you can't pull up anything or expound on it yourself, and why the outright heel-faced-turn regarding Ranger when you only vote him at that point?
"Because the brevity doesn't speak to me like you're trying to justify a case, rather that you're trying to hammer what part of the majority believes."
ShinigamiSorry, missed this on you asking me what you missed.
Sorry Tiruin. Could you answer my question that I asked earlier today. I would like you to confirm how I'm expected to answer your question before I answer it.
Tiruin- Daruish seems to have dropped more scumtells. I'll go in depth into my case with him by the end of the day.
Tiruin plays Lenglon's recorder as a gift from the good friend.
"Seems to."
"Is that all the difference there is? Because Dar..'seems to' have dropped more scumtells? Other than that, what's your take on them then?"
PPE DS, ZU
Author
Topic: Toon Mafia VII - But I Don't Want To Re:Love! [Game Over] (Read 169564 times)