Shinigami:Swordsmith- looks like scum to me. I was looking for not truly threatening banter between Ranger and others and swordsmith seems to fit the bill So when are you going to actually start questioning borno? There's only a few hours left to D2, and you've done nothing since Friday. And when you voted for borno, Griffionday was still questioning him - he hadn't 'left off' him at all. You're activelurking, bandwagoning scum, Cado.
Death sword- What are your opinions on what the motives might be for Okami to be killed. Would you have made the same move?
Also congratulations on killing one of the scum. What made you decide to vote on him?
Swordsmith- Everything you have been doing honestly seems a little fishy to me. Would you like to explain your motives? You also voted Ranger. Could you answer the same question as written above.
No one has posted recently and I am new so I feel like I am doing something wrong. If I am please let me know and I will try to fix my ways.
To start with, welcome to the game. If you feel like no one has posted recently, that is one of the best times to post. Inactivity only benefits scum. As for non-threatening banter, I can see how you'd think that. During D1 and early D2 I thought Cado was more noob town than scum, following Griffionday because Griff was doing a great job at scumhunting. When he just stopped doing anything D2 is what made me switch my opinion of him. I had about 15 minutes to write up a post when I voted him D2, and I usually take a long time to write up my posts. Not nearly enough time to put together anything decent at that point, so I just threw in a line that sounded aggressive. The part you quoted was the aborted beginning of me writing up my own case on Cado. The only reason I posted at all was because I didn't want to just disappear from the thread for two days.
I voted Cado because I thought he was scum. He was promising actions but not actually doing anything, despite having plenty of opportunity, and he was bandwagoning whoever Griffionday was questioning.
As for Okami, I'd guess that the scum NKed them because of effective scumhunting. So far, they've killed Griffionday and Okami No Rei, both of whom were doing a fair bit of scumhunting and generally seemed to know what they were doing. That would've been my reasoning for killing them, anyway. And yes, if I were scum, I would have targeted those two.
What, to you, is the scummiest kind of action? Have you seen such an action in this game?
Death sword-- It is hard to tell. A tell tale sign of a scummy player will be seen if they are not a good player I suppose. They would make themselves obvious. I haven't really seen that in this game. Ranger was definitely the most suspicious but he is gone now. Looking for people to just make a small mistake is foolish. You should keep your eye out, but in this kind of game people over think things and will go on too hard for natural human errors. I can see scummy things in any post but you need to take things with a grain of salt. I am really looking at people who interacted with the scum we already found right now. They could have tried planning on working together to divert suspicion and distance themselves wile not making a strong case against the other. For example not taking quotes to back up their points or saying things that have already been said.
Because of these reasons I am going to vote for swordsmith04
If a scumtell could only ever be utilized in one case, then nobody would ever have more than one vote against them. Bandwagoning is a scumtell; agreeing that someone is scum isn't necessarily one. You might notice that I voiced suspicion of RangerCado before Okami No Rei did. If you didn't, the relevant posts are
here and
here.
Now I've got a question for you. Why would you try to sub into a game where you already knew who one of the scum were?
Borno: Is that all you've got after disappearing for an entire Day?
What do you make of RangerCado focusing on you, but not actually doing anything until pressured?
Author
Topic: BM XL: Miner's Mafia (Scumteam Wins!) (Read 45439 times)