I am going to wait for people to review this video a bit before I watch.
What I heard of "Damsel in Distress" was between it being extremely terrible and Very good.. and I ended up somewhere in the middle. Where I agreed mostly with the gist but where there were some strong disagreements and where I thought her examples were terrible and that she never really gone far enough in depth and missed out on some areas of great comparison. (The "Princess who gets captured" becomes an archetypical hero character... thus losing her princess qualities... What a coincidence. Though I've seen someone argue this point better then I ever could)
I am hoping with all the sweet sweet time she took between videos that she has improved her argument strategy and examples... and doesn't switch between metatextual and narrative on the fly.
And right at the start she singles out violence against women as being inherently worse than violence against men.
Does she at least qualify this statement OUTSIDE a "Well women get beat up in real life more often, so they should get beat up in games less often"? Or by analyzing the type of violence towards women in games and showing it to be different then that towards males? As well as giving counter examples?
Why reawaken this ancient evil?
Not everyone hated it
For the longest time the general consensus was that what she was saying wasn't EXACTLY wrong, outside a few things, but that she sucked at telling it.