Nowhere in that statement did I say all men are brutes, or indicate that Anita's rape threats make you wrong.
Which is why every single one of your posts has been laden with emotionally charged bullshit, completely ignoring any of the points I have made or just you getting embroiled in confusion and saying 'this is your fault, you do not know how to write.'
I talked about how Anita has given interviews where she has created this image of a 'gaming culture' and called it misogynistic and evidence for a large sexist society,
using trolls on the internet to represent them.You started saying she didn't say all gamers are trolls, nor halo players trolls, then you said I was making bullshit implications. Of course, you were right in the former, and that's because that wasn't the point I was making.
Then you started going on about how 'Have they sent YOU rape threats and made face-smashing flash games of YOUR image?' [sic].
Then you conflated it with terrorism.
Then you said my point about how you should 'Go buy the games that interest you,' was irrelevant without justifying why supporting the game studios that do what you say is irrelevant.
Then you said my question about why video game designers should not have free reign over their game designs was irrelevant without justifying why.
Then you made an oversimplistic view on male characters
which is also wrong, and used that to justify your point that women and men are absolutely incapable of recognizing attractive features.
Then you said you could argue 'my position,' whatever that is, better than I, despite providing no argument. Then I provided my argument, and you refuted nothing.
That statement was in response to you claiming that everyone on the internet gets the same amount of harassment and that it has nothing to do with her feminist position.
And that is not the statement I made. My statement was that all internet personalities have the same treatment, yet only in this case do we see people looking at it and saying things like 'this suggest to me that video gamers are more sexist than they admit,' and only in this case do we see people holding it on a pedestal over all others.
Do you understand what trolling
is? They are saying sexist things because she is feminist, is followed by feminists, and they know it will piss them off. Anyone who's worth their weight in internet knows this. An internet personality attracts a hateful following as much as a fanbase, and anything they invest importance in will be used against them.
This pattern has been around for a decade.
And I made a much better argument in the sentence directly after, which you didn't quote. I later apologized for providing (a valid example which countered your idiotic statement but was also) an emotional attack on you. I'm sorry for offending you back there, but you still can't argue a point.
0/10
Not even mad
Your examples have been utter trite, and I've already refuted them. I'm sorry you don't know how to have an actual discussion. Or rather, I'm not sorry really, just generally apathetic about it. Go do whatever you wish.
Please stop replying until you can actually address points with relevance, and kindly abstain from misstating the positions of others as cheap shots.
You:
- Haven't made any relevant points.
- Haven't addressed relevant points.
- Have only made emotional arguments.
- Have only misstated the points that make you mad.
If I were as vindictive as you, I would tell you to get out of this thread.