So be specific, Neonivek. What about my post did you object to, which I haven't already addressed?
That you are attacking people on the basis of not being men, invalidating their opinions, and being generally sexist.
As I've said before the second "Mansplaining" enters the conversation, it is over.
Do you, or do you not, disagree with my claim that anecdotal empirical evidence would favor womens' accounts over mens'?
Yes... I do disagree... because I am unfortunately a person of logic and science and have studied everything from demographics, to law, to science itself and know that just because an account is first hand it doesn't mean it is correct.
There is a certain amount of due diligence required.
As well I am also a person well versed in conversation and debate, even if I stink at it, and know that in order to have a proper conversation you have to treat people as if all their opinions are equally valid.
Saying "Well you don't have the same experiences I do, and as a man you never could and that is why your opinions on this are inherently weak" is just a fallacy.
You CANNOT claim "I am a woman, thus my experiences matter more than yours do" anymore then a man can. Gender flip it.
you just hate "mansplaining" as a term since it's "sexist", which I'd strongly disagree with but have nothing to disagree about since you don't really have an argument backing the claim that it is sexist
Because it was so inherently sexist I didn't think I needed to explain. I honestly thought that bringing this up I'd have someone more qualified to explain this call up.
But lets break it down. What does mansplaining mean? Well lets see: "Mansplaining is a term used largely by feminists to describe the act of men "teaching women", often about things directly related to women's experience (like sexism, or abortion) without any recognition of (or interest in) the woman's actual knowledge of the topic" Ohh that is all fair and good... But what does it REALLY mean in this context. Ahh yes, it is when a man explains their point of view and asserts it over a woman's opinion. Better yet, that is even what it means within context of the definition.
In otherwords it is being used to mean "When a man has an opinion a woman disagrees with". It is a "Shut up" phrase through and through with no intellectual merits.
If it has ANY conversation merit, I have yet to hear it be used in that context.