Tiruin: Why are you voting TolyK over Sheep?
Because I have one vote and I'm in a conundrum of Sheep's motives. He seems more like he's drawing his scumhunting from the BM (and thus, what I told him >_>), but I've seen contradicting statements and am still finding out his validity.
And I'm still musing about TolyK:
> If TolyK is town, then that would explain the process of how poisoning/antidote'ing would work. He wouldn't know his targets. If scum, then it would be damned deadly, however that would explain why we've got no NKs. Because there were no NKs. All hypothetical of course, but by far, TolyK looks like the most deadly person at the moment.
> He missed one special point I was asking and due to stuff going on IRL, I didn't address it but focused on the post near the end of the thread...
TolyKCould you answer this. Straight?
And why I asked whether anybody did anything on me: I wanted to know if any town person redirected me. Why? I don't want folks to die unless they're scummy, and I want to know who to save near day end.
At least here, this explains that you've got two distinct actions and that you should name and choose your antidote-receiver.
However. Funny thing?
Q: Can't scum just kill you and, with you, two (or even 3, if lovers) more people?
A: Nope, I made sure before the end of N1.
Oh so now we've another day action which does something funny, huh. Or something working in tandem with you poisoning NQT. Because 'before end'.
I don't get what you're asking. I asked Wuba about my role, and got an answer, and so I felt it was okay to do.
I bolded my question. How did you make sure before the end of N1?
...Judging by that answer, I can guess that its an inherent thing. That if you die then your targets who were poisoned won't die due to lack of antidote.
I want your answer though.
Also, cheerfulness is not equated to using and abusing the
smiley to explain what you're planning. For all reasons, its annoying. You can be cheerful in any other way, because that explanation about cheerfulness hits me like a scapegoat for your....antics.
Query: Why of all things, did you expect people to say their actions on you when you asked them about it--seeing as you were only concerned with any redirect, huh?
HapahRequest Replacement. There's just no way I can keep up with my current schedule. These 12+ hours days suck, and it's going to be like this for the next two weeks.
Get well soon.
TWSGiven that your whole case on me is lying. Something of which:
> Already has the post in question down.
> Speaks about a one-time situation @ D1.
> In regard to such, speaks of me as town if not for that presumption of lying...which actually is moot given the context.
> Has not yet been defined and only inferred from the meaning of lying.
My case is lying? How?
First point: No idea what you mean.
Second point: You mean speaking about the situation in D1 that was the entire basis of my case on you? You bet I'll bring that up.
Third point: Why moot? And I've already said, not all facets of somebody's play have to be scummy for that person to be scummy. I know you're capable of playing a good scum game.
Fourth point: Yeah, I missed it.
I meant your case on me was wholly based on lying and you consider that damning evidence enough to point me out as scum.
First point: I already did post down that post which you were basing your case on. 'The case of the missing post.' Which then you still declare that I'm lying about it.
Second point: Entire basis. Indeed. What else do you have to bring up on it? Gonna hinge everything there and not expound or do anything else to justify that Tiruin = scum?
Third point: Its moot because you're presenting a conjunction. If I hadn't 'lied', I'm town. If I did lie, I'm scum. The only basis you have of me lying is your own perception. QED.
And I don't see what you're trying to get there by attributing my gameplay with whatever.
Fourth point: Glad to see you've missed it.
Next point:
Does lying have a different definition in a BM than elsewhere? Lying = saying something that is not true.
YES. DOES LYING = SCUM?! YOU ONLY BELIEVE I'M LYING BECAUSE ITS PURELY BASED ON YOUR OWN PERCEPTION.
YOU AREN'T PROVING IT AND ARE FLUFFING THE WHOLE AREA UP BY THAT. YOU'VE TUNNELED ME FOR MOST OF AN IN-GAME DAY AND WHAT HAVE YOU TO COME UP WITH IT? A "MY VOTE IS ON TIRUIN BECAUSE I BELIEVE SHE IS LYING."
IT STILL COMES DOWN TO THAT. Meaning I've no way of persuading you otherwise. How do you think lying is a conclusive enough fact here to mark me as scum? I posted down what I intended--later, rather than never due to me technically sifting through my browser to find it-- and all I get is still the same reply of you believing otherwise!
How can I defend against that?
I mean, I see more of your argument going by what I said as an IC, in the BM. I'm seeing you acting on what you've gotten in the BM. Hence me attributing most of your works to the newbie card earlier...something which I didn't like because most of it comes from my mouth. In a situational basis.
Query though:
Sure. I don't have many solid reads, though. From scum to town:
Tiruin - Explained above. Suspeced lying, etc.
TolyK - See below.
Vector? - Don't know if she should be here. Having trouble pinning her down, but gut says scummy.
Hapah - Seems to be activelurking slightly. Griffionday brought up a good point. Close to neutral.
Toaster - Basically neutral
NQT - Confirmed by Ranger, who I trust quite a bit. Haven't seen much suspicious from him.
RangerCado - Strange claims, but from his play I can't see him being scum.
Griffionday - Town. Hunts well, has made very few mistakes.
Yer reads, aye?
RangerCado lied. Yet he's near the town top. You can't see him being scum albeit he admitted to lying.
Wtf are you getting at TWS.
Moderator Webadict: Votecount? Also, my blood pressure reading?