Zrk: Is that all you've got on Tir?
I had a whole post, but I deleted it and I haven't had the time to make another solid one. NO exam tomorrow so I'll be able to do it then.
I'd be expectant of it.
As for now, I really suggest you take it off and focus on your studies...Because exams. We've an extend going in anyway.
Zrk - Wat.
On Tiruin:
You have been inconsistent on your scumhunting, most notably on TolyK, then you have tried to minimize/deflect the cases presented against you instead of addressing them. Your scumhunting has been hit and miss and your responses have not been conducive to good scumhunting by others.
Oh dear me. You conclude much without even giving me anything of your own questioning! Very interesting how you're gauging my scumhunting without any conclusive evidence; or evidence at all on the ideas. Then you give a twisted detail on the case (singular) presented against me.
Hey, smarty. Read what I said. I'm addressing TWS. If my scumhunting has been hit and miss - what results are there for you to work on? Where is the conducive evidence that so condemns me?
Because this is even worse than anything you did D1. What do you mean by inconsistent scumhunting and how does that apply here?
I mean that you have been all over someone in one post, and then ignored/softballed them in the next. It's like you can't orient yourself or feel confident in your vote. [...] It means you aren't comfortable in that role and that means you can't be town.
And yet nobody asked regarding what you see right here. Let's all jump! Jump jump jump to conclusions~
And no. The proceeding sentences after #1 make/have no sense regarding that case there.
It means you aren't comfortable in that role and that means you can't be town.
This in itself is a total fallacy. "You aren't comfortable in this role = You aren't town." @bolded part: I am confident in my vote, good sir. And I know where the direction of this ship I'm steering is headed despite not having a conventional compass.
I've got the stars and mine eyes to follow. Anyway.
So you're going on the psychology that scum/third-parties are implied to be uncomfortable in their role...why? Same goes for town but in the vice versa example.Lastly:
You scumhunting being iffy is in and of itself a result.
You delusional man. Have you even asked me anything regarding my
anything? No. You jumped. You jumped to conclusions like everything else you poked at me from that last time. See what I did? Vagueness. Let me clarify.
You jumped to conclusions instead of asking me my reads, anything regarding my finds on the people I've scumhunted (and by that I mean making a good case out of what I said) and are just trying to undermine it by giving this scathing opinion here which would settle itself as it's contradictory.
You see my scumhunting as iffy? So do I on yours, but I've reasons behind them and yours on mine? It's more of a continuation from yet-to-be-proven ground.
Let's all conclude that the absence of questions, despite the apparent presence of suspicions, mark scumhunting. Yes. That would be the day.
PPE: Griff, TolyK and Hapah. In that order.