Tir: I think I just need to avoid posting while stressed out of my mind. ~_~
I brought it up because it came to mind, that's all. We might end up lynching some kinda active player and having Wuba explode all the lurkers. I played "Jump to Conclusions" when I saw you reference that the prior modkilling was justified; which for some reason made me think that you knew this rounds was or wasn't justified. Basically, I'm just derpy today!
Weeeell, in context...
they were all asking for replacements. Not necessarily lurking.Get some sleep, you.
TolyKI'm being careful who I vote here, since (a) I might not have time to change the vote later, though with the extend it's a bit better, and (b) it can result in ties.
Also, my suspicion-o-meter is usually out of whack. Yeah. :/
This still points at the vote leaders. Which I do realize you're prodding at, but not preferably answering my intended question. Because you're
not voting at all nor are you pressuring anyone but just answering questions to you.Uh. I've outlined the people I think are a bit scummy, but they're not past my "vote" threshold.
And I do not know who would be the mislynch, obviously. I prefer to hold back so that I could say "told you so!" later.
Bit scummy = no vote? Because they're not past a threshold?
I mean, you did answer what I asked:
Regarding your view on the vote record, what is your take on those nearing the lynch? Details included; all of them, please. Meaning those you named.
TolyK: As the day starts coming to a close, who do you think is the most likely to be lynched and who will you vote for based on the current information?
Judging by the votecount and what I've read into so far, probably Ranger or NQT, with a chance of Zrk. NQT due to his claim, though I think we should wait on it and posibly experiment with it. Ranger due to being "different" in his thoughts. Zrk due to the vote record.
Uh. It would take forever to do details, and I barely have time to put this up anyways.
I try a quick one, though.
Zrk2 seems the most scummy now, though as Ford said (and Griff noted) it's "him acting in character". Possible link? I only have the gut feeling and general association, since I haven't read many of his posts in-depth and those I have don't really seem wrong to me. Might vote for.
I don't honestly know about Ranger, he's really mixed for me. Probably won't vote.
NQT is really strange. I can't find a flaw in his logic, and haven't yet seen how it would help scum EXCEPT if he did two townies.
If two people die soon from being linked, and they're town, NQT'll probably be a good lynch. But for now, I want to see where this gets us. Probably won't vote.
Recap? Meh, doesn't seem like I want to vote for anyone quite yet. Still got that "don't want to mislynch" stuff, probably.
And then...? Your proceeding posts don't indicate even a hint of you moving on anyone.
I think we've pretty clearly established Deathsword's scumminess. What, do you not think there's anything off about him?
Hm. Convince me?
Really. Anyone. Get your own reads. Why should Vector convince you? You said it yourself, you don't want to mislynch stuff, probably. So
what in the world are you doing about it?!~Asking others' weak questions that lead onto a trivial part of the case...then what? You're literally abstaining from the vote because you think mislynch over anything else?
TWSAlright, my reasoning came out a bit wrong there. "Do you have nothing else to offer?" was the wrong wording. What I meant was that Tiruin is an advocate of pressure votes(I think). However, he had not pressure voted a single person other than TolyK, whom he wasn't really suspicious of. This seemed a bit odd. Furthermore, he put this vote on the person he was already voting for. This speaks to me of not paying much attention to where one's vote is, which strikes me as very scummy. Tiruin, did you know your vote was simply staying on TolyK?
Yes I did know it was staying on TolyK. For reasons that:
1. He took most of the weekend because seemingly RL stuff.
2. I'm also doing investigations on Zrk and Ranger and most of the others in my posts -- the lack of a vote also works in a psychological manner (pseudo-pressure? The term is lost to me but it deals with pressure) here as the fact that my vote was still on TolyK at the time.
3. Wasn't really suspicious of? That's...Griff, right? Or me? Because I was darn well suspicious of TolyK then. The reiteration of a vote is to remind the person that I'm still voting them -- many people do this over an extended period of time, if you'd look back (along with looking back at many of the other games, its pretty much common).
4. Your suspicions are agreeable...for one who seems to use the lurkertracker as the only aide in scumhunting. Why is the re-voting scummy, in your opinion? Where did you see me not being suspicious of TolyK and how are you concluding the above?
5. Quote where I'm an advocate of pressure votes. In a definitive way, please.