Day is tiring :S
Summer is tiring...Body is ache.
TWSNot a single time do you mention any missed questions. You continue as normal. If, as you say, you were voting for him because he wasn't answering your questions, I'm fairly certain you would have mentioned them. Unless, of course, you didn't ask him any.
I guess I was too focused on the others I was pressing to mention that to TolyK. Knowing the guy, he addresses everything pointed to him so I'm quite unsure how the lack of me saying the missed questions part (semantically) marks me out. The intention of me voting there garners...what?
...And I stand by what I said before. Still unsure how that correlates with the current time. How does this deserve your vote? [Other than forcefully and perhaps shamefully remind me of being forgetful]
FordTiruin. I feel the Sheep is on to something, and I want to put my vote behind it.
...I can't think of anything else to add to what he said. The way that Tiruin voted Tolyk has been sticking out to me for a while.
That came off weaker than I'd intended. Let me try again.
Tiruin: WTF? Y U NO GIVE GOOD REASONS?
Woo! My very own meme! Hate those things.
That came off worse than you first intended, actually.
So you want me to lie and give stuff that I can wisk out of the tip of my thoughts, right? That's the only reason I have and I'm not changing it for the sake of "
good reasons". My sarcastic voice is laughing in irony at your intention up there. Meaning: I'm reading this between "what is ford doing" and "I'm wondering if he's trying to be funny at this time. Wait wat. How can someone waste a post declaring all that?" Or....you're completely stressed out for some unfathomable reason and are taking it out on me.
Because that's [the post and everything in it] going along the lines of fluff - nothing building into it. While you do say that you've nothing to add to TWS's case, I'm looking at his case as pressure. You've nothing to add to pressure or nothing to add at all. With nothing behind it but fluff and you hopping on TWS' explanation -- while he did start a case, he didn't mention the causative reasons marking that out as scum if that was his intention -- You didn't and jumped on, but I appreciate you putting your time into making a memetic picture than expounding on your post so I'll say it here...
Expound on your reasoning. Unlike TWS-
Wait, that came off weaker than I intended. Let me try again.
WTF ARE YOU GETTING AT FORD?! WHERE THE HELL IS YOUR REASONING THERE? YOU'RE JUST HOPPING ONTO SHEEP'S BACKSIDE AND USING HIS FLUFFYNESS TO BOOST YOUR FLUFF!
I've replaced DS, gonna vote Tiruin tentatively.
Tentatively, I sense a weak bandwagon of poor quality.
Why?
Update: Now I'm in the lead...Ok.
Vote Count
------------------------
Captain Ford - Toaster,
Zombie Urist - Griffionday
Griffionday -
Hapah -
notquitethere - The Soldier, Vector,
RangerCado - Zrk2, Urist Imiknorris,
The Soldier -
TheWetSheep -
Tiruin - TheWetSheep, Captain Ford, Zombie Urist
Toaster -
TolyK -
Urist Imiknorris - Hapah, RangerCado,
Vector -
Zrk2 - Tiruin
No Lynch -
Not Voting - TolyK, notquitethere
8 To Hammer. Day Ends Thursday at 9 PM Central.
Timeconverter? I've been busy the argh-day and body really aches.
Edit-post-reread:
TWSTiruin: Okay, I'm not sure how to take this alleged "phantom post". Can you recall what was in it and summarize for us? Also, does this mean your vote on TolyK was not a pressure vote?
I'm a bit skeptical. I'll have to reread your posts around that time and see if they make sense with your story.
Take it as you will, but I'd like you to answer how that makes me deserve a vote above. It was regarding
his only post after mine, wherein I was aiming at a conversation and pinned the thought down for later whilst poking at the rest.
Fishing through my browser library, I found the post in one of the Post Reply tabs...anyway
2. I prefer setting traps to outright killing people, as scum. If you remember a previous game (where both of us were scum I think >.>) that was a very funny tactic indeed.
Oh, in the BYOR? The trap part was when we used a poison attack on ZU - hoping it would hit others targeting him...funny =/= failure, but I've to agree there. Bad choice, particularly, but the ending was...
Well, addressing that and your other points to my question regarding you as a third-party/scum in that situation, I hope you do remember that you outed yourself. Right? You did claim the poison when nothing was stated beforehand -- thanks to Hapah's vigilance, it paid off. Then the game collapsed on us. Anyway:
Third party? Probably unkillable jester that can do fun things at night.
...Why?
> The third is Webadict. Because he's our lovely mod.
Why'd you want to screw with people as a third-party in that situation? That's against your wincon as a Jester.
What? No, you would WANT to screw people over, then have yourself found out. When people see they can't kill you they'll try to lynch you. You can probably just quietly get yourself lynched, but it's more funny when you're causing chaos.
Just like how you did yours back in that game? When people see they can't kill you, they assume its something of a lighter verse as a bulletproof role, IIRC. Like a protect. Or a redirect if anyone else is killed. Or a roleblock.
So how does getting yourself found out from the bolded portion work?
TheWetSheep, you probably picked water, huh? 
Just kidding. Who do you think will be lynched today (by category, not names), and if you were a day investigator, how would you pick someone to investigate? (Investigate alignment, action or whatever).
NQT, what do you think about there being quite a few people here who won't go the "traditional" way (i.e. newbies/foreigners/whoevertheybe)?
TolyK, ... well, damn. I probably shouldn't have entered my name, huh. Well, okay then, next?
Vector, what's our Victor? Err, whatever. Why do you think you were one of the leading roles in the flavor at the beginning, considering Wuba said it would be a medium-flavor game?
Your questions seem more of being a buddy to others than poking at them.
Why is your question to Vector mainly about flavor?
Why did...you insert yourself for more text?
And why are all your questions going along the 'Investigate' line of interrogative gestures?
Mafia is srs bsns, rite?
It's an RVS question, Wuba did say something about flavor, so it might be partially important, which is why I ask.
That was a joke, though I did actually roll myself in Random.org, which is why I thought it would be funny (at least to me).
There was only one investigate question, where does "all" come from?
All > your only sensible question in that post. It's a blank set to try to get out more answers from inferrance. Which means I'm talking about that question to TWS.
If you rolled yourself in Random.org, why didn't you just shift it to someone else? I mean, it could be used
for anything other than waste time -- yeah, it's RVS, but are you going to be that random and delve into the line of silly?
Your only question to Vector
is about flavor. I mean, I do that too sometimes, but then add something pertinent alongside it. Why didn't you?
Why the cheery mood?
ZrkOk, let me get back to your main point regarding those lurkers.
Zrk
I did not make the case that there should be no scumhunting D1, I said that policy lynches or acceptable. Obviously if someone seems very scummy then we should lynch them. But baring overtly obvious scum then a policy lynch of a lurker/terrible scumhunter is not a terrible alternative.
Lynching a lurker gives next to no information, though, right? People with meaningful interactions give a lot more information.
It doesn't, but letting a lurker live will generate even less because they won't do anything the next day either. I believe that in the long run lynching lurker will provide more information because the lurker wouldn't be doing anything the next day either.
Ugh. You're being obstinate about the lurker won't do anything during the next day. What makes you so sure about that?! Faulty logic.
Precedent is generally quite good at predicting future actions.
Hell no it isn't.
OK. Webadict messed with the rules and didn't declare anything towards lurkers.
Also, I only prod those that I am asked to prod.
'Cept this. I inserted that into how you were getting to that point but...Precedent?!
Noun
An earlier event or action regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.
Adjective
Preceding in time, order, or importance: "a precedent case".
Synonyms
noun. example
adjective. previous - preceding - foregoing - prior - antecedent
Your only basis is that they lurked earlier. If someone was up for the lynch; meaning that lurking = online and doing other things, then they'd at least act. And now you're sticking with that kind of logic...
What would you do if they did reply? What would be your statement against them, would your suspicions remain or...what?
Webadict: -5 GMT your timezone, right? Can't bother to remember or do anything later on because physical status: Bad.
Author
Topic: Magic Mafia - Game Over! (Read 222242 times)