1: Once they settle there, and of course by the regular definition of normal australian, you assume they will have no problems that will unsettle them when they move here. Nothing worth getting excited about. They'll just be incredibly content, and they'll never have to speak up at all ever again. Nope nope nope.
2: Explain to me how I was wrong in how faulty the logic was. Rioting advances no causes of theirs and only caused trouble for the whole system.
3: See above. We've gone over how 2nd generation immigrants is where shit really hits the fan In previous threads.
4: Because they are willing to go through legal channels?
Also, state a better solution than camps with very good living conditions in comparison to their old lives. Please, I'd love to hear it.
1. I assumed no such thing. Where did I assume this?
2. Your strawmen are strawmen because you made up their logic on the spot, without a shread of evidence to support your immigrants model of logic. You have also dumped your logic on all immigrants indiscriminately. Their cause is generally
to be noticed, as they feel they have been ignored (their cause is not to "cause the government millions in damage", for example. That silly). With that in mind, it actually
has advanced their cause.
3. Whats this about 2nd generation immigrants?
Were we not talking about allowing potential 1st generation immigrants? i.e. the ones in the detention centers. Ontop of that, you missed my point: not all Muslims want Shairah law (thats why "will" is in bold).
4. Because boats in particular have been heavily politicised. Illegal immigrants come by planes too...
5. So would I. You werent suggesting a strawmen where I was implying that all the camps should just be torn down and absolutely anyone can come in without any restriction or control, were you?
My orginal argument was to give better legal access to Australia, followed by my attempts to demonstrate immigrants are not an amorphous blob of "Them" which just wont "shut up" and would cause random riots, along with demonstrating the abhorrence of statements like "Biting the hand that feeds you".