Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 302 303 [304] 305 306 ... 341

Author Topic: Additional CIA japes [DPRK Thread]  (Read 552995 times)

Paxiecrunchle

  • Bay Watcher
  • I'm just here, because actually I don't know*shrug
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4545 on: August 31, 2017, 11:54:13 pm »

I was just wondering was there any if you had seen this analysis? I found it rather convincing but I'm sure most of you have more data on the subject than I do.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=b2DtWz0yEOY

wierd

  • Bay Watcher
  • I like to eat small children.
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4546 on: September 01, 2017, 12:27:38 am »

There are significant problems to that strategy though (see prior video);

1) A crippled/failed nation is a nation with very little wealth, even for the fabulously "wealthy".  A borderline impoverished American has more "wealth" than a "wealthy" North Korean. Basically, Un's decadence is about on par with somebody who eats out every night and routinely shops at a liquor store. (with a prostitute addiction.) Conceivably, a middle class american could get most of that ticket, and still keep the lights on.  Comparatively, ruling a nation the way Un does just results in the ruler living very low class as well.  There are better ways to live such a life without dragging thousands of people through the dirt and starving them to death.

2) With the above in mind, there are additional costs to sustaining a despotic regime, such as psychological/happiness costs. Sure, you get to be the guy who is "In charge", but you also have to watch out for knives in the back around every corner, suspect every wall of having ears, and castrate your own economy to stay "In charge."  Does the happiness boost of being "In charge" give sufficient value to offeset all the negatives and sources of systemic unhappiness that come along with this method of maintaining it? (Read the original story about the sword of damoclese, and how the flatterer begged the tyrant-king to take him off the throne in the end.)

Instead, NK could have pulled in with China, and been strong economic partners with their big red neighbor. They could have a rising standard of living, and be a real global contender.  Instead, the Kim-Jongs have systematically ground their nation into the ground, and now need "the ultimate weapon" to be taken seriously. They are a pathetic mockery.


Logged

SaberToothTiger

  • Bay Watcher
  • Wannabe Shitposter
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4547 on: September 01, 2017, 02:50:08 am »

Dirt-poor people have less sway than people who can afford not to starve. As a Stalin era figure put it, as long as the common man is busy sustaining himself he won't have time nor energy to think.  If the Best Koreans were able to live the life of Soviet citizens of, say, the late 1940s to the early 1950s they would already have enough to pose a threat. Any wealth over the bare minimum makes a man more conscious of the world around him.
Logged
I gaze into its milky depths, searching the wheat and sugar for the meanings I can never find.
It's like tea leaf divination, but with cartoon leprechauns.
There are only two sure things in life: death and taxes and lists and poor arithmetic and overlong jokes and poor memory and probably a few more things.

wierd

  • Bay Watcher
  • I like to eat small children.
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4548 on: September 01, 2017, 03:07:54 am »

Missing the point I made:  That is how he "stays in charge"-- but staying in charge by that means comes with a heavy cost, specifically, psychologically. (sword of damoclese)

There are other ways of staying in charge, or better, making that moot. (See for instance, British royals. Not really involved in government except for a very small and well defined role, but loved by the masses, and permanently enshrined in wealth and decadence. For the most part, their nation is prosperous and wealthy.) The point of being in charge is that you get to live the high life. As stated, the NK "high life" is about on par with "middle to low wage american life." He could be sailing the world in a 200ft private yacht, with a bathtub filled with fine champaign. Instead, he has to feel naughty drinking imported hard liquor, and worrying about his cabinet assassinating him.

Somehow I doubt that Prince George worries that the houses of Lords and Commons are going to snuff him.  That is a fear that Un genuinely has.
Logged

martinuzz

  • Bay Watcher
  • High dwarf
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4549 on: September 01, 2017, 04:51:06 am »

Putin has warned that South Korea and North Korea are balancing on the edge of a major scale military conflict. He calls the US strategy 'a dead end'.
According to Putin, sanctions and military pressure are misplaced and useless for trying to persuade NK to stop it's nuclear program.
He says the the US, Russia, and the countries in the region should initiate talks with North Korea, without any predetermined terms or conditions.

Meanwhile, the French minister of foreign affairs, Jean-Yves le Drian warns that North Korea will have a deployable long range nuclear missile within a few months now, confirming suspicions of US intelligence.
He urges that the conflict should be resolved through diplomacy.
"Within a few months it will be reality. The situation gets extremely serious and explosive when North Korea has the capability to attack the US, or even Europe".

https://www.volkskrant.nl/buitenland/poetin-waarschuwt-voor-grootschalig-militair-conflict-tussen-beide-korea-s~a4514403/

Damnit, Putin. Can't you just, not meddle and interfere for once? Wasn't illegally annexing parts of Ukraine, and turning Syria into even more than a clusterfuck than it already was enough for now?
Logged
Friendly and polite reminder for optimists: Hope is a finite resource

We can ­disagree and still love each other, ­unless your disagreement is rooted in my oppression and denial of my humanity and right to exist - James Baldwin

http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=73719.msg1830479#msg1830479

Sheb

  • Bay Watcher
  • You Are An Avatar
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4550 on: September 01, 2017, 04:53:57 am »

Russia border NK, it's fair to say that they should be involved in whatever problem is around.
Logged

Quote from: Paul-Henry Spaak
Europe consists only of small countries, some of which know it and some of which don’t yet.

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4551 on: September 01, 2017, 09:24:20 am »

They've also been involved for decades. Plus since they have a border with NK, they certainly have an interest in things not blowing up as they'd have to directly deal with any fallout (nuclear or otherwise) that comes with a conflict. Not that it would free the US from any obligation in having to deal with any long term fallout.
Logged

martinuzz

  • Bay Watcher
  • High dwarf
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4552 on: September 01, 2017, 11:27:18 am »

Being involved is one thing. Meddling and interering specifically to pester and discredit the US is another. Besides, Kim Young One is threatening the US and it's allies in the region, not Russia.
Logged
Friendly and polite reminder for optimists: Hope is a finite resource

We can ­disagree and still love each other, ­unless your disagreement is rooted in my oppression and denial of my humanity and right to exist - James Baldwin

http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=73719.msg1830479#msg1830479

martinuzz

  • Bay Watcher
  • High dwarf
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4553 on: September 02, 2017, 07:15:21 pm »

North Korean state media KCNA reports proudly that NK scientist have succeeded in creating a hydrogen bomb that can be fit into the NK missile systems.
Supposedly, Kim Young One was present at the Institute for nuclear Weapons today, when a bomb was loaded into a missile.
According to KCNA the institute recently developed an advanced nuclear weapon with great detructive power.
Kim Young One stated that he believed his scientist's claim, and praised the "unrestrainable might of the North Korean armed forces".
He added that North Korea has the capability to make as many nuclear weapons as it wants.

https://www.volkskrant.nl/buitenland/noord-korea-meldt-trots-plaatsen-van-kernwapen-op-raket~a4514685/
Logged
Friendly and polite reminder for optimists: Hope is a finite resource

We can ­disagree and still love each other, ­unless your disagreement is rooted in my oppression and denial of my humanity and right to exist - James Baldwin

http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=73719.msg1830479#msg1830479

redwallzyl

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4554 on: September 02, 2017, 07:28:34 pm »

Sounds a bit unlikely.
Logged

Starver

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4555 on: September 02, 2017, 08:33:00 pm »

As I recall, none of the static tests of (probably not optimised to warhead mass) nuclear devices have yet shown any signs of being a H-Bomb, and some were even detected as likely suboptimal A-Bombs.

To have produced a provably working example that fits on their current rocket-tech is indeed unbelievable.

(I can't help but think of that room of international diplomats in Iron Skies, when the NK one claims responsibility. Although that was in a world where Dundee 1, Spitfire, a surprising Mir and three Banzai modules, amongst others, suddenly appeared in orbit, every ship a surprise to each other. Or at least (almost as bad) seemingly them all unknown by the US.)
Logged

Trekkin

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4556 on: September 02, 2017, 09:28:55 pm »

As I recall, none of the static tests of (probably not optimised to warhead mass) nuclear devices have yet shown any signs of being a H-Bomb, and some were even detected as likely suboptimal A-Bombs.

To have produced a provably working example that fits on their current rocket-tech is indeed unbelievable.


Not to mention that they're apparently still working with spherical warheads. The picture shows a dumbbell-shaped weapon, which makes sense for a Teller-Ulam design with a spherical primary and secondary separated by a cylindrical sparkplug. It suggests their computing power is somewhat lacking, and that they will hit fundamental constraints on the size of their physics packages simply because the nose of a missile can only be so snubby.
Logged

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4557 on: September 03, 2017, 12:07:11 am »

Now they've gone and done an underground nuke test, detected via 6.3 magnitude 'explosion'.

As for putting a warhead onto a missile, we certainly don't want to find out the hard way that they have that capability.
Logged

alway

  • Bay Watcher
  • 🏳️‍⚧️
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4558 on: September 03, 2017, 12:47:26 am »

Notably, prior tests were measured around 5.3; so I guess that verifies it being a fusion bomb.
(edit: Side note, from what I can tell, the earthquake measurements also correlate with the blast power roughly linearly; so the 10x difference from 5.3 to 6.3 means the payload itself is about an order of magnitude more powerful; this seems to be confirmed by more up to date reporting now giving ~100kt estimates compared to prior 10kt-ish in power)
« Last Edit: September 03, 2017, 01:13:26 am by alway »
Logged

ChairmanPoo

  • Bay Watcher
  • Send in the clowns
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4559 on: September 03, 2017, 03:41:53 am »

Not the first ti,e they make this claim
Logged
Everyone sucks at everything. Until they don't. Not sucking is a product of time invested.
Pages: 1 ... 302 303 [304] 305 306 ... 341