You: "If Vector flips town, Hapah would be the most suspicious for getting a scum result on her."
Me: "If she's telling the truth (and a townie would have no reason to lie), then she redirected him to Deathsword and so HE's scum, not Hapah."
You "But Leafsnail, and things."
What was even the point of that?
Ok, let's put the situation in a Vector =
Townie. situation.
If Vector - town. Then her redirect - Hapah > DS.
DS = Scum.However, LS says that Vector targeted him. Meaning she either hit Hapah to redirect ONTO LS, OR, she redirected LS...onto whomever.
That's where the paths divide. LS. He's saying that Vector targeted him. While he could be bluffing, I tested it:
> I stated that I targeted him. He stated,
point blank, that he also subtly knew that I targeted him. Now, at that point in time, nobody could know if I'm bluffing or not. He could either be playing a real risky gambit. But its true - I did target him, and nothing came of it [My result].
So hence that case. While Hapah's investigate on Vector is really damning evidence, combine that with what kind of silliness we're seeing
just after D1 and then arrive at what I'm thinking. Note that I'm still holding Vector under suspect - its just that I'm poking at all the other ends.
Because if Vector were town, then LS and DS both outed themselves if going by your logic. That mode of thought on Hapah = suspicious was a theory due to my thinking at the time going along the idea of "Why would Hapah claim an investigate on a townie that falls as scum? She didn't claim Miller. Or...attack Hapah instead. So Hapah must be telling some sort of truth?"
Ergo, I put up the ideas in the above posts. Though maybe its just me, as LS hasn't posted...in a
long while. With loads of brevity.
Leafsnail, where are you and your answers to the questions posed to you.
UI: So...now that you've seen my viewpoint, what's with yours? Focusing on me from very skewed bases and assuming that I'm Vector's buddy - you didn't answer this; or saying that I'm forgetting about her - weird for you to assume such, which leads me to ask
why?