Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: NYT: What Housework Has to Do With Waistlines  (Read 1979 times)

penguinofhonor

  • Bay Watcher
  • Minister of Love
    • View Profile
Re: NYT: What Housework Has to Do With Waistlines
« Reply #15 on: February 28, 2013, 10:26:47 pm »

The ever-present threat of communism made Americans constantly aware of their capitalistic work ethic and self image. Now that it's gone, they've fallen into complacency.
Logged

Truean

  • Bay Watcher
  • Ok.... [sigh] It froze over....
    • View Profile
Re: NYT: What Housework Has to Do With Waistlines
« Reply #16 on: February 28, 2013, 10:34:50 pm »

The ever-present threat of communism made Americans constantly aware of their capitalistic work ethic and self image. Now that it's gone, they've fallen into complacency.

I was typing up something with Beatles references, Joe McCarthy, Mister Rogers (red sweater, "very suspect"), and several other things, but I like your phrasing better. Let's go with that.
Logged
The kinda human wreckage that you love

Current Spare Time Fiction Project: (C) 2010 http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=63660.0
Disclaimer: I never take cases online for ethical reasons. If you require an attorney; you need to find one licensed to practice in your jurisdiction. Never take anything online as legal advice, because each case is different and one size does not fit all. Wants nothing at all to do with law.

Please don't quote me.

Max White

  • Bay Watcher
  • Still not hollowed!
    • View Profile
Re: NYT: What Housework Has to Do With Waistlines
« Reply #17 on: February 28, 2013, 10:36:25 pm »

Ok, either I am pretty much lulling myself into getting trolled here or we are reached the point where your too emotional about a subject to make a reasonable point. Or both.

Scelly9

  • Bay Watcher
  • That crazy long-haired queer liberal communist
    • View Profile
Re: NYT: What Housework Has to Do With Waistlines
« Reply #18 on: February 28, 2013, 10:37:36 pm »

Ok, either I am pretty much lulling myself into getting trolled here or we are reached the point where your too emotional about a subject to make a reasonable point. Or both.
...Are you sure you're in the right thread?
Logged
You taste the jug! It is ceramic.
Quote from: Loud Whispers
SUPPORT THE COMMUNIST GAY MOVEMENT!

Truean

  • Bay Watcher
  • Ok.... [sigh] It froze over....
    • View Profile
Re: NYT: What Housework Has to Do With Waistlines
« Reply #19 on: February 28, 2013, 10:38:57 pm »

[shrugs]

The "study" is BS. The only thing here really is to say how it is BS, unless I'm missing something.
Logged
The kinda human wreckage that you love

Current Spare Time Fiction Project: (C) 2010 http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=63660.0
Disclaimer: I never take cases online for ethical reasons. If you require an attorney; you need to find one licensed to practice in your jurisdiction. Never take anything online as legal advice, because each case is different and one size does not fit all. Wants nothing at all to do with law.

Please don't quote me.

Max White

  • Bay Watcher
  • Still not hollowed!
    • View Profile
Re: NYT: What Housework Has to Do With Waistlines
« Reply #20 on: February 28, 2013, 10:42:39 pm »

The study concludes that as a general trend, women burnt more calories doing housework in the past than they do today. Is that false? Heck the same is true for men, but most likely to a lesser degree as men didn't do as much housework in the past because of the 'Guy goes to work, girl stays at home and cleans' attitude.

What part of that is inaccurate?

Flying Dice

  • Bay Watcher
  • inveterate shitposter
    • View Profile
Re: NYT: What Housework Has to Do With Waistlines
« Reply #21 on: February 28, 2013, 11:16:40 pm »

Men also burnt more calories on average when their typical work consisted more of manual labor and less of paper shuffling. It's not wrong to make the assumption that that shift is one of several factors which has resulted in the average male weight going up, is it? There's no value judgment being made re: woman and housework, just an observation. And a rather obvious one at that, on the order of "Average human weight increased to a certain degree after the spread of the automobile/locomotives/animal-drawn wagons/the wheel/domesticated animals/etc. replaced the previous common mode of transportation.". Less physical exertion = fewer calories burned. Fewer calories burned with the same (or greater) intake results in weight gain.
Logged


Aurora on small monitors:
1. Game Parameters -> Reduced Height Windows.
2. Lock taskbar to the right side of your desktop.
3. Run Resize Enable
Pages: 1 [2]