Count the number of people you know who cannot even do simple arithmatic in their heads without a calculator. Count the people you know with horrible short term memory, and just wikipedia everything.
You sound like the Greek philosophers disparaging the written word because it will allow people to write down epic poems and not remember them entirely from memory. Humans only have so much brainpower. If we can outsource that to allow us to work on problems that we cannot, that is a good thing.
And hey, the cybernetic enhancements you so despise might just let us increase our brainpower, so that solves that.
Let me put it this way; why would a human want to squash a cocroach?
The analogy does not hold. Once again, you are assuming that a true AI is a godlike power compared to us and would hate us because of some stupid Hollywood thing like we "aren't logical enough".
An AI has zero reason to hate us.
You seem to be missing my point. Eventually the AI is going to be smarter than us at
everything, rendering all human thought obsolete next to it. the difference is that humans will no longer have an inherent advantage over the machines they created (or perhaps the machines that our first-gen machines created). Also, I don't like the idea of cybernetics, but that's more of a morality question than logical.
At one point, humans did not hate cocroaches either. Now that we have better ways to dispose of our own waste, they are seen as unnecessary and just get in the way. Cue exterminators. I suppose it's possible that they won't turn out that way, but they were programmed by a species that
is like that. Even if they didn't try to kill us all, I'd rather we be the dominant life form instead of them having to babysit us.