Shakerag: I totally needed to hear that. What is your opinion about using spoilers so you can address secondary points while keeping your main points clean? Does it help? Make things worse?
Either way, I will definitely take this advice forward.
This is a cleaned-up version of my last post:superBlast wasn't the one who was most affected in the context of the game, not by a long shot. You and I both know that wasn't what I was referring to.
No, no I didn't. You didn't bother to clarify, and I'm not psychic.
You posted a load of information that happened to be laden with sideways accusations when you could just have easily PMed it, then claimed that nobody needed to read it. That's a passive way to go about building a case, and looks sneaky as hell. The notes on borno are the ones relevant to the game as it stands, and you're purposely ignoring them while going on about how you just wanted to be helpful to super. Great. Super. I don't care.
[...]
So in other words, they weren't worth posting in the context of the game, they were worth posting in the context of you helping super. And yet somehow they were posted in the game thread, despite their value being only for superBlast's enlightenment and your own back-referencing. That equates to them supposedly not being worth talking about in public view. You're contradicting yourself here.
[...]
There's no optional content in Mafia. There's useful data, insights, and analyses, and there's junk not worth posting. If you posted it, you obviously think it was worth mentioning, and yet you keep saying that it isn't necessary for us to read it. That's massively contradictory, and comes off very poorly on my proverbial sneak-o-meter.
Sorry? How am I ignoring them? I've used them in pressing borno, and responded to the issues he brought up. You haven't actually pointed to anything specific in their contents, just kind of vaguely handwaved in their direction.
Let me clear about what I said, since you seem very confused. I have never said my notes were insignificant.
I thought they were valuable. Otherwise I wouldn't have taken the time to write them. I made a decision to share them,
for reasons I outlined earlier. I never said they didn't need to be read. That is a judgment YOU make, not me. I only ever said that I expected most people to skip over them.
There are definitely times when I've skimmed or skipped over things that other players have linked to, spoilered or referenced. The only difference between a link to a wiki and a spoilered dissertation on theory (or an analysis of voting patterns, or notes on happenings in the game) is that one is in the thread, and one isn't.
"...which frankly I couldn't be arsed to read completely"
Uh huh. Case in point.
Except not at all. I skimmed it, noticed that it was a list of summaries with a bit of superficial analysis, and didn't bother wasting my time carefully reading and re-reading each entry. WoTs are fine, but unless they have some sort of real insight I don't really care.
Uh huh. Case in point.
So you're saying that, if you take out the post with my personal notes in it, it looks like I'm lurking?
In the context of those notes? Yes. Hells yes.
Bullshit. You're calling me out for lurking when we have NQT who hasn't posted in six days, when we have ICs that have posted less than a sixth as often as the newbies, and when I'm spending most of my time waiting for the rest of you to post.
See my previous response. Incidentally, voting me just after I drew attention to your shenanigans, and voting me because I call people on suspicious behavior? No, not scummy at all, Captain Ford. You're second on my list right now.
And you're first on mine. You're experienced enough to know the adage about asking questions if you're not totally sure. But you haven't been asking questions with your votes.
Lol.
"Drew attention to my shenanigans" - Oh yes, like you're the
first one to do that. Except, wait, borno actually read what he was responding to. You haven't.
For clarity, I'm voting you for:
1. Remuthra's behavior, which you can't control, but reflects on you nonetheless. Simply dismissing it as "flailing newbie syndrome" reflects even more poorly on you.
2. Word-twisting and exaggeration.
3. Passing judgment but not probing for more information.
For a recent replacement, you are too satisfied with your reads, and for an experienced player you are too conservative in your approach.