scrdest, believe it or not, but I'm a big fan of Marx's analyses. Not so much of the conclusions he drew, but that could stem from my being a member of the bourgeoisie
lij, I hope that 'fixating' bit didn't come across the wrong way - what I meant was
that you seems to try to fit a situation in the Marxist class structure when other definitions would probably serve your purpose better.
So I tried to seize the opportunity to learn more about the Marxist definition of 'class'.
In the process of production, human beings work not only upon nature, but also upon one another. They produce only by working together in a specified manner and reciprocally exchanging their activities. In order to produce, they enter into definite connections and relations to one another, and only within these social connections and relations does their influence upon nature operate – i.e., does production take place.
These social relations between the producers, and the conditions under which they exchange their activities and share in the total act of production, will naturally vary according to the character of the means of production.
Hm, I think this allows me to phrase my problem more precisely: Can we really say that a teacher, an industrial worker, a farmer, and a guy collecting bottles to make a few cents share the same conditions and social relations? I guess this was a sensible definition in Marx's time, even though the urban/rural split between farmhands and the industrial proletariat makes some trouble. But the integrating forces of pre-neoliberal capitalism, which have allowed the 'working masses' to get a share of the power, a share of the wealth, a share of the surplus they produce, along with the technological and cultural advances, which have led to a great diversification of production, have blurred the lines too much to keep this definition salvageable, methinks. I'm happy to be proven wrong, by the way - do you happen to have a link to a short intro to a modernized concept of class which addresses these concerns?
Pseudoedit: Alienation theory has become problematic as well: There's lots of people who would need to be classified as workers who would not describe their work as alienated. Teachers (at least some of them, certainly not all) come to mind.