Let me simplify that then: No, what i am saying is that the only way to really help italy and those refugees is by diverting them to SA (And other oil rich countries that yet to accept meaningful numbers) and pressure it to step up its effort to help and properly treat other human beings. on how to do it, well, there are smarter men than me, but i guess few obvious options could be: 1)SA needs stuff, Europe can prevent them from having stuff. 2)SA needs geopolitical assistance. Europe could prevent them from having it. 3)Europe could simply turn all those refugees back to libya. after a few turns, they and their friends will prefer walking to other places since paying thousands of dollars simply not worth a risky round trip across the med sea and SA would rather have immigrants than refugees in other neighbouring countries getting neglected and pissed off which will backfire on them eventually. (Which is a very relevant reason why they upped their donations to the UNHCR recently)
Couldn't find much beheading of refugees since they simply don't have much of those refugees anyway, but the refugees, which do not require direct quotes to grasp the theme because they are not trying to win an argument but rather stay alive, see these links down below and make the connection. also, what would you imagine be the punishment for obscure, non western people illegally entering Saudi Arabia? probably the first option is simply getting deported, probably after getting beaten up, yet, the risk of being charged with a made up accusation of "Drug trafficking", "Terrorism affiliation" or other such nonsense which could be resulted in getting beheaded to sway others from attempting entry is a very real one.
http://mic.com/articles/44303/a-shocking-look-at-the-way-saudi-arabia-deals-with-its-immigrantshttp://www.presstv.com/Detail/2015/03/24/403201/Two-more-beheaded-in-Saudi-ArabiaArgument actually seems to be that since some moderately affluent foreign nations that are closer to the source nation are shitting on refugees, so should the EU. "I think we should act no better than the worst actor involved" is a helluva' humanitarian position.
Well, momentarily, sort of. and since i don't give a damn about perceived shallow humanitarian positions, i have no problem with that. Europe can't handle this influx of immigrants for various reasons, some are social, some financial and some are security related, so for a very short period of time you act as "the worst actor involved" (Hardly so, since you don't behead them, simply refuse them of entry. not to mention we already have accepted a lot) until those hardly moderately affluent countries step up their game and the problem is properly addressed rather than get band aided. every country accepts refugees according to its social and financial ability (We wouldn't be foolish enough to force Sunni refugees on Iran, for example) and the burden is shared across the world. i think this is a much better solution than just sending them to lengthy and extremely risky quests which will eventually see them become unemployed angry mobs since europe can not and will not properly address so many of them.