do you think that India's liberation was a Nazi thing?
Actually, it kind of was. Nazi did a lot in order to help India's liberation, and Ghandi has even wrote a letter to Hitler praising him and scouring England for violently resisting Nazi Germany.
Gandhi wasn't the Indian liberation. Gandhi is promoted, sure, and not least because he wasn't a very staunch opponent of imperialism, oppression, exploitation. This argument in favour of national liberation being Nazist is about as serious as Nazis being Hindu because of the swastika, or the other way around. It's complete nonsense. As for Nazi support... I can't say too much about that, since I haven't immersed myself too much in that aspect of them, but the basic idea of imperialist policy is not just propping yourself up, it's also attacking your enemies and making them less powerful. Divide and conquer is a very basic maxim. There's also the side of this that perhaps the Nazis wanted a nation sympathetic to them, allies are valuable. But does any of this mean that the liberation was national-socialist in character? I am not convinced.
I was about to delete or otherwise edit my reply because this is a complete non-engagement with history and facts, but I'll stick to the other component of that plan even if my deletion would be too late now. If you want to understand why national socialism and genuine socialism are different (and before you bring up any stupid No True Scotsman arguments, I'll shoot you with a fallacy fallacy),
study them. And by study I mean even a preliminary look-up on
Wikipedia will show you some very real differences between the ideologies of say, scientific socialism and national socialism, not to mention
the actual bloody politics.