Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Poll

Can we make a nice gaussian-looking curve?

A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A

Pages: 1 ... 992 993 [994] 995 996 ... 1393

Author Topic: Sheb's European Megathread: Remove Feta!  (Read 1772638 times)

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Sheb's European Politics Megathread
« Reply #14895 on: February 18, 2015, 06:56:13 am »

Just to clarify: Owlbread is not talking about London, but about the City of London Corporation, a weird cross between a local authority and a medieval merchant guild that rule over about a square mile of central London, is elected by residents and local businesses (which may appoint a certain number of electors) and de facto serve as a trade body for the London financial industry.

Sounds somewhat like the Hansa or something.
Logged

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: Sheb's European Politics Megathread
« Reply #14896 on: February 18, 2015, 03:31:32 pm »

Owlbread, historically the only way to get corporate support without adopting neoliberal economic policies is to have similarly powerful structures to replace their influence. If corporations are truly the keystone to Scotland's independence and you don't want SNP to become Labour-Tory Scotland then the solution is in powerful trade unions, cooperatives, and other socialist nightmare organizational structures.

Or so past experience would dictate, anyway. A wholly new independent parallel to market capitalism could also do the trick, but I wish you the best of luck if you try to take that path.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

Sheb

  • Bay Watcher
  • You Are An Avatar
    • View Profile
Re: Sheb's European Politics Megathread
« Reply #14897 on: February 18, 2015, 03:52:01 pm »

Well, that's not entirely true. I think in this case it was mostly opposition to change: stability is good for business. If another referendum takes place following a Brexit, stability would be on Scotland's side.

Owlbread, will you campaign in favor of a Brexit? It is after all your best hope for an independent Scotland.

On another note, the Guardian dug up this speech from two years ago by the guy who's now the Greek Finance Minister: Yanis Varoufakis: How I became an erratic Marxist. Great speech I think, worth reading.
Logged

Quote from: Paul-Henry Spaak
Europe consists only of small countries, some of which know it and some of which don’t yet.

mainiac

  • Bay Watcher
  • Na vazeal kwah-kai
    • View Profile
Re: Sheb's European Politics Megathread
« Reply #14898 on: February 18, 2015, 07:42:27 pm »

We're only appealing to the 5-10% of the No voters we can actually reach, who were motivated to vote No by the Vow/out of fear.

Yes god forbid you actually fix the problems with the movement and win over the segment of the electorate that had intelligent objections.  If something doesn't work the first time it's time to ignore all the naysayers.
Logged
Ancient Babylonian god of RAEG
--------------
[CAN_INTERNET]
[PREFSTRING:google]
"Don't tell me what you value. Show me your budget and I will tell you what you value"
« Last Edit: February 10, 1988, 03:27:23 pm by UR MOM »
mainiac is always a little sarcastic, at least.

Owlbread

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Sheb's European Politics Megathread
« Reply #14899 on: February 18, 2015, 08:20:52 pm »

Yes god forbid you actually fix the problems with the movement and win over the segment of the electorate that had intelligent objections. If something doesn't work the first time it's time to ignore all the naysayers.

That's not really what I said. We're trying to win over the 5-10% of the electorate that we actually can win over. The swing voters, as it were. I've always maintained that Scottish opinion on this issue is divided into thirds - the emotional supporters of independence, the emotional supporters of the union and those that can be convinced. They need to be convinced "of independence" though - considering the Union is the status quo, they were already backing the Union in 2011.

This can actually be seen in early opinion polls (2011/2012 etc) where support for independence was clearly defined as being at a third - about 30%. We didn't need to convince that 30%, they were already backing us. However we were able to make enough inroads into the third-or-so of the electorate that could be classed as swing voters that we almost convinced half the electorate overall, reaching 45% of the vote, gaining about 15% over the campaign period. If we're going to win next time we need to convince the 5-10% of the swingvoters that, according to polls, seem to have been either backing us or at least open to backing us before the Vow and the corporate onslaught in the final week of the campaign.

In the same way you're probably not going to convince a working class white gun owning Baptist Iraq War veteran from Georgia to vote for Hilary Clinton in the next Presidential Election, we're going to find it very difficult to convince elderly people who grew up proud of Britain and its Welfare State, fearful of immigrants, fearful of the SNP (they were pretty crap/crazy back then), fearful of foreign forces (thus supportive of nuclear weapons) and skeptical of the EU (Scotland used to be the most Eurosceptic part of Britain in the 1970s) to vote for independence in 2020. We can try, I certainly did, and we convinced some of them, but we're not going to convince enough. At the moment people in my local campaign branches have been trying to set up drop-in workshops where elderly people can be taught how to use social media, turning their focus away from the TV and the newspapers where the Unionist line dominates. That's a start, and we'll hopefully build on it as time goes on.

Owlbread, historically the only way to get corporate support without adopting neoliberal economic policies is to have similarly powerful structures to replace their influence. If corporations are truly the keystone to Scotland's independence and you don't want SNP to become Labour-Tory Scotland then the solution is in powerful trade unions, cooperatives, and other socialist nightmare organizational structures.

Or so past experience would dictate, anyway. A wholly new independent parallel to market capitalism could also do the trick, but I wish you the best of luck if you try to take that path.

As much as some figures in the SNP would balk at the concept of trying to support all those Socialist nightmare organisational structures, we do need to win over the trade unions this time if we're going to make the kind of headway we need to in Scotland's working class districts. If we're going to get a decent Yes majority in traditionally working-class areas like Fife next time we'll need the backing of unions like Unite. We already won over most of the working class, routinely getting Yes majorities in towns, but not by enough.

Well, that's not entirely true. I think in this case it was mostly opposition to change: stability is good for business. If another referendum takes place following a Brexit, stability would be on Scotland's side.

Owlbread, will you campaign in favor of a Brexit? It is after all your best hope for an independent Scotland.

I am going to be perfectly honest in saying that I do hope Brexit will come for the reasons you pointed out, if I said otherwise I'd be lying. At the same time I do disagree with it, as do the SNP and other pro-independence organisations, and if we campaigned in favour of it at a UK level and against it in Scotland we'd have absolutely no credibility.

The same thing happened with the Smith Commission proposals on further devolution; I really, really hoped we'd get shafted over them because I knew that would cause the electorate to become disillusioned with the process. I kept my mouth shut though; the party line was that we needed to embrace it and take it as far as we could go. Guess what; we were shafted by Labour and support for independence is currently sitting at around 53% according to the last poll I saw.

It's dishonest in some ways, it feels unnatural not to be campaigning/arguing for something I want to happen, but if you've got principles you need to stick to them. It's just politics.
« Last Edit: February 18, 2015, 08:32:20 pm by Owlbread »
Logged

mainiac

  • Bay Watcher
  • Na vazeal kwah-kai
    • View Profile
Re: Sheb's European Politics Megathread
« Reply #14900 on: February 18, 2015, 09:36:55 pm »

snip

Not what I was saying.  Although there is a certain symmetry to what I was saying and you choosing to ignore what I am saying in this fashion.

And I mean really, what are you saying this for?  Do you really think what I am saying is that you should try to convince the hardcore unionist Tory crowd that they want to be Scottish socialists?  If you are projecting an immensely stupid argument onto me then you are probably doing something wrong or are trying to show disrespect to me.
« Last Edit: February 18, 2015, 09:41:40 pm by mainiac »
Logged
Ancient Babylonian god of RAEG
--------------
[CAN_INTERNET]
[PREFSTRING:google]
"Don't tell me what you value. Show me your budget and I will tell you what you value"
« Last Edit: February 10, 1988, 03:27:23 pm by UR MOM »
mainiac is always a little sarcastic, at least.

Owlbread

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Sheb's European Politics Megathread
« Reply #14901 on: February 18, 2015, 10:04:08 pm »

Not what I was saying.  Although there is a certain symmetry to what I was saying and you choosing to ignore what I am saying in this fashion.

I'm sorry, what were you saying? Do you want me to convince you of the economic arguments for independence or something? Or the swing voters? Because... that's kind of what I proposed we do on the last page... don't you remember all that time I spent rabbiting on about the need to get more corporate support so we don't have the most powerful corporations in Scotland (e.g. companies that deal in pensions) saying they're going to up sticks and abandon us? The ultimately successful economic case against independence almost entirely revolved around the looming corporate evacuation post-Yes vote. According to some polls the currency union stuff from the UK Treasury caused support for independence to actually rise, believe it or not, as much as I didn't like arguing in favour of it. People were so tired of Better Together banging on about it after the second TV debate that Alistair Darling was completely rejected by the public and the Unionists had to hide him and get Gordon Brown to come up instead to make loads of wild promises (Vows) he couldn't keep.

And I mean really, what are you saying this for?  Do you really think what I am saying is that you should try to convince the hardcore unionist Tory crowd that they want to be Scottish socialists?  If you are projecting an immensely stupid argument onto me then you are probably doing something wrong or are trying to show disrespect to me.

I just got your edit there, my apologies. Considering I'd already talked about trying to appeal to that third of the swing voters (of which we need to get enough to raise our support by 5-10%) and you were asking me why we weren't targeting those with "legitimate concerns" (i.e. that 5-10%), I presumed you didn't understand that, rather like in the USA, support and opposition to independence is very entrenched in certain demographics, a bit like Republicans and Democrats. Where there is a hardcore pro-independence vote, there is also a fairly hardcore Unionist vote of very comparable size.

To put it in a shortened but confusing way, I thought that you thought that there was no hardcore Unionist vote, only people with "legitimate concerns".

You know, I went canvassing about 3-4 times in my local area last summer (going around districts knocking doors etc) and whenever I knocked a door and asked someone "have you made your mind up about what way you're going to vote in the independence referendum?" and they were a No voter (of which there were several, though I was mostly tasked with helping get the core support out) they'd just look at me like I was some kind of god-bothering Jehova's Witness and say "Yes". If I asked "Is there anything we could do or convince you of to change your mind?" every single time they said just abruptly said "No" and that was that, door closed. On only one occasion did I actually end up debating with one of them (i.e. the local Tories, the hardcore 30% Unionist vote, all over the age of 60 I should add) and I remember thinking we needed to paint a red cross on the guy's door for future reference because he used the opportunity to express his extreme distaste for all the "immigrants and Moslems" in the SNP. When they were undecided or undecided leaning No, they just said "I need more information". Whenever I asked exactly what information they needed (I had a copy of the white paper on my phone and I could have talked to them about it) they weren't able to tell me, and if they didn't consider what I told them satisfactory they weren't able to explain why. They would then tell me "I'll make my mind up on the day, thanks" and that was the end of it. I found it very frustrating, as you can imagine.
« Last Edit: February 18, 2015, 10:11:47 pm by Owlbread »
Logged

Owlbread

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Sheb's European Politics Megathread
« Reply #14902 on: February 19, 2015, 07:58:46 am »

To be fair, they did that for the same reason you do it to a Jehova's witness. You've made up your mind and you can't be arsed debating with someone when you know it won't go anywhere.

I know, if they came to my door I'd probably give a similar response, though after doing the knocking myself, I wouldn't be quite as abrupt as they were. It's just very frustrating when you're trying to convince people, but you will only reach a few people at a time in practice.
Logged

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Sheb's European Politics Megathread
« Reply #14903 on: February 19, 2015, 09:18:11 am »

Owlbread, historically the only way to get corporate support without adopting neoliberal economic policies is to have similarly powerful structures to replace their influence. If corporations are truly the keystone to Scotland's independence and you don't want SNP to become Labour-Tory Scotland then the solution is in powerful trade unions, cooperatives, and other socialist nightmare organizational structures.

Or so past experience would dictate, anyway. A wholly new independent parallel to market capitalism could also do the trick, but I wish you the best of luck if you try to take that path.

This early morning, I read neoliberal as neolithic for a second for some reason. Just saying.

No idea what the heck neolithic economic policies would be anyway, lol.
Logged

Mechatronic

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Sheb's European Politics Megathread
« Reply #14904 on: February 19, 2015, 09:46:57 am »

Conservative neolithic economic policy is largely divided into two camps: meso-neolithic moderates and the paleo-neolithic ultra-conservatives. Meso-neolithic policy aims to maintain the robust industrial methods of the mesolithic while taking advantage of efficiencies of modern technology. It is favoured by the existing elite as way of maintaining the status quo while allowing for growth. Paleo-neolithic policy has gained popularity among the disenfranchised by harking back to a largely imagined era of values literally set in stone.

Progressive neolithic economic policy rode the wave growth caused by mass production and the development of agriculture and pottery, championed by the "neolithic riche". However it has been recently wedged between the meso-neoliths and a emerging metallurgical radicals.
Logged

Phmcw

  • Bay Watcher
  • Damn max 500 characters
    • View Profile
Re: Sheb's European Politics Megathread
« Reply #14905 on: February 19, 2015, 10:11:54 am »

There are evidences of mediteranea-wide trading during the neolithic so I guess it was already interesting.
Logged
Quote from: toady

In bug news, the zombies in a necromancer's tower became suspicious after the necromancer failed to age and he fled into the hills.

Askot Bokbondeler

  • Bay Watcher
  • please line up orderly
    • View Profile
Re: Sheb's European Politics Megathread
« Reply #14906 on: February 19, 2015, 11:05:24 am »

barter economy is killing gift-economy based businesses! we should resort to bartering only for inter-clan transactions
also goat stomachs are biased, sheep guts are a much more reliable source of polithical omens

mainiac

  • Bay Watcher
  • Na vazeal kwah-kai
    • View Profile
Re: Sheb's European Politics Megathread
« Reply #14907 on: February 19, 2015, 12:43:06 pm »

We dont actually have evidence that barter killed gift economy.  We have evidence of gift economy from anthropology then we have historic records of temple and palace cities that used debt and taxation arrangements to create credit economies.  The evidence of barter economies only shows up in post metalic currency history.

The myth of barter economic evolution is interesting because it exposes the holes in the human process.  People who live in a world with money will, if there is no money, revert to barter.  As such we think of the past as a world without money and imagine they used barter.  But that's just us projecting our mindset onto the past.
« Last Edit: February 19, 2015, 12:45:04 pm by mainiac »
Logged
Ancient Babylonian god of RAEG
--------------
[CAN_INTERNET]
[PREFSTRING:google]
"Don't tell me what you value. Show me your budget and I will tell you what you value"
« Last Edit: February 10, 1988, 03:27:23 pm by UR MOM »
mainiac is always a little sarcastic, at least.

Helgoland

  • Bay Watcher
  • No man is an island.
    • View Profile
Re: Sheb's European Politics Megathread
« Reply #14908 on: February 19, 2015, 12:57:12 pm »

How big were these gift economies?
(Also, linksies?)
Logged
The Bay12 postcard club
Arguably he's already a progressive, just one in the style of an enlightened Kaiser.
I'm going to do the smart thing here and disengage. This isn't a hill I paticularly care to die on.

Descan

  • Bay Watcher
  • [HEADING INTENSIFIES]
    • View Profile
Re: Sheb's European Politics Megathread
« Reply #14909 on: February 19, 2015, 01:10:22 pm »

Wild guess: probably not much bigger, if at all, than Dunbar number levels. On the order of a single tribe/village.
Logged
Quote from: SalmonGod
Your innocent viking escapades for canadian social justice and immortality make my flagellum wiggle, too.
Quote from: Myroc
Descan confirmed for antichrist.
Quote from: LeoLeonardoIII
I wonder if any of us don't love Descan.
Pages: 1 ... 992 993 [994] 995 996 ... 1393