Yeah, I'm not sure what the NHS has to do with this.
They desired a treatment the NHS would not provide, so they went somewhere they could get that treatment, and then were arrested for that. Perhaps not a direct involvement, but the fact remains that they were in all practical terms arrested for refusing to do what the NHS authorized.
As I understood it, it's the parents causing the trouble, as the boy might die without the right treatment and machines to feed him and they just removed him from the hospital without consultation.
NHS not paying for expensive experimental treatment is sad, but not unusual, and it certainly wouldn't be easier to get that treatment without NHS.
XXSockXX, You keep assuming some level of sanity in Russian political leadership I don't see that. The only thing that can change the course to a big, big war - revolt inside Russia. Will thousands of dead Russian soldiers and deteriorating quality of life provoke that? I don't think so. As likely, as Germans staring anti-Hitler revolt in 1944.
Well, there is still hope that it might work out, even if without a revolt in Russia. More dead Russian soldiers could turn public opinion a bit. Economic sanctions and lower quality of life might make the population more angry at the West than at their government, but the sanctions will cost some influential people a lot of money. And if we assume that Putin has some imperial aspirations, he won't risk getting nuked, so no WW3.
Seems like NATO and EU (ever slow as hell) are in the process of changing their positions to a harder course, specifically because the situation brings up memories of pre-WW2 appeasement policies and their disastrous results. The German president even said
something to that effect (history shows that "appeasing aggressors only increases their appetite") at a WW2 memorial in Poland, which is pretty symbolic.
Still no good perspective at all for Ukraine, which is a shame really.