From what I've gathered from Mainiac's posts, he has a background in economics. Give up while you still can, Mr. Strange. You will not win this one.
I assume he's doing news reporting on economy for Fox, from his arguments.
Logical failures galore and you can keep loaning money infinitely without ever having to pay it back. Definitely background in economics.
And with a map dated 2009! In a discussion of what happened between 2010 and 2014. Joy! I am learning so much from you!
Here, you again keep ignoring that Greece had economical problems before 2010 and try to frame the issue to only involve time after their problems became public and debt costs skyrocketed, and any even remotely painless method of fixing their debt without causing economic crisis like the one we have now became impossible. If you weren't doing that and admitted their deficit and debt issues (and other issues, like corruption and tax evasion cutting state income) predate 2010 you would learn from that 2009 graph more than from some biased charts using cherry picked data. Oh wait, you're ignoring that part.
Econ 101 pop quiz!
Ignoring the point I made to repeat what I had said earlier somehow proves me wrong? Alien logic...
I know, I know. You are thinking "but these questions are so simple to a hotshot like me! I'll just whip out the middle school math and answer in thirty seconds!" But hey... if you have ten minutes to write an angry reply then you have thirty seconds to do the basic math of the situation, right?
Considering only one of us is writing angry rants here and ignoring third grade math questions, I'd say answer is Fox news logic: ignore the question and change the subject.
Seriously, your whole argument boils down to "it's so unfair" and "it's not working", and I'm not disagreeing with you on there, but you're acting like a kid throwing temper tantrum after you throw a toy on the floor and it breaks.
You said that
people are insisting that Greece didn't do what it did
and I told you what people insist Greece didn't do; specific cuts to social spending that Greece had agreeded to do that were requirement for the aid package and then refused to do, leading people to question Greek gov's intentions and ability to make further cuts demanded. You could post the whole Greek budget from last ten or twenty years here in full detail and it won't change a thing, Greece has that data, EU has that data, all the negotiators are going over those numbers arguing "what do". Greece could have done what they had promised to do and shove the results at troikas face to show them the result of their demands, but that's not what they did isn't it?
They weren't even some vague "cut spending X% in Y years" kind of thing but defined amounts in specific named areas like pensions, but Syriza and friends went "nope, were not doing that". That's what Greece was critised for not doing, but you keep denying it.
Tl;Dr: Greece promised to do a thing, Greece refused to do a thing.
This might seem like I'm being unnecessary anal about this but I'm not arguing that Austerity™ is a good thing, moral thing, or even a working thing. That sort of argument might be your fetish but not mine. Mine is that you're misrepresenting and ignoring facts of the Greece situation.
Of, and Fox news level arguments. Especially those.