The basic reason I didn't want to pass judgement on that was because there are times when police think someone (often an innocent civilian) is being threatening, because that someone doesn't even know that they're the ones the police are asking to throw down their (non-existent) weapons, etc, so don't make the right moves, and so the police feel that they need to act to safeguard themselves or others.
Still an error on the police's part, so I'm not forgiving them (although fear on their part might be a mitigating reason... anger, however, should not be, and ulterior motives of "shutting the fucker up", if that was what happened, would be utterly wrong), but I was keeping my mind open on that aspect. While pointing out that it wasn't the totally incorrect judgement of aiming at the wrong colour of vehicle.
Please don't take what I say as meaning I support deliberate police brutality, and I'm not too hot on the accidental variety either. Maybe time will tell what really is happening. (Or maybe not. The story may become too boring and lost amid all kinds of other sensationalist reports of other things, or indeed there may be a conspiracy that strives to bury it. Who knows.)
Do you want a flippant comment? For a guy who explicitly went out of his way to kill people, and to not kill everyone... Well, he couldn't have been that good with weapons, or methods of attack, for an LA cop with an apparent sideline in the military. There you go, flippancy over, and I'm sure there's going to be more tragedy along the line. The guy can't hurt me and I can't hurt him so I'm stuck on the sidelines on this one, and I'm very much glad for that fact. The real people involved are going to be (or have already been) less fortunate and no words of mine will help here.