http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/stl-info/st-louis-crime-reports-for/html_9ffe4219-05aa-526d-92a1-3661d6b66842.html?appSession=825132192592636Year to date, homicides for St Loius. Jan - Sept = 101
The previous years tally up to september were 79 last year, and 89 the year before. So "expected" rate "pre-Ferguson", let's call that 85 by averaging the last 2 years data. What that suggests, is that if there is any direct Ferguson effect on the murder rate, it's at most 16 cases. Anyway if you look at historical data, 2012 and 2013 were below-average for St Louis. so this year isn't any different to other years.
http://www.city-data.com/crime/crime-St.-Louis-Missouri.htmlOk, maybe an annualized rate isn't picking up the scale of the riots. Let's look at a more recent data slice. 9 more people were murdered in St Louis from Oct 1st-Oct 20th (murder #102-#110):
http://www.riverfronttimes.com/related/to/Murder+and+Homicide/So that's an annualized rate for the period of early October of 164 murders (9 murders / 20 days * 365 days/year). Which would actually be
lower then the average murder rate in 2008, which was 167. Yes that's right, October in St Louis since the riots started was safer than the city was in 2008, at least in terms of your chance of being killed by a stranger. Your chance of being killed by a cop however, has in fact skyrocketed.
Basically, going off available statistics, there's absolutely no reason to think St Louis has more murders than other times when the riots weren't happening. Hence, if there are any riot-related killings, they're not even statistically significant enough to blip the murder rate up over previous years, let alone comparable to a war zone as the "over 100" killed because of the riots bullshit suggests.