I am apt to ramble on about things when I'm lost. Yeah :/ sorry
If you know the first mission only has one spy, can you please explain? Please please please please please please explain to me why there was only spy in that mission.
Seeing my explanation, I know its really unbelievable if we go by the normal Mafia way. One is, I know I'm town, therefore singling me out. Let's get the point that this is the core basis of my case. If I'm scum, then nothing else matters because I'd be lying through my teeth from day 1. Know that I'm generally against that, but debating that part of lies would just lead to a bad end. I'm also basing most of me theory on mission results and people's reaction to them.
Those two reasons are clear in my mind and I wholly agree with them. To add to that: I am the leader of that mission. There are only two other people up for suspect. Now they could both be spies, what led me on that tangent was their replies to the results of the first mission. Toaster reacted neutrally, holding both others in speculation for scum.
Leafsnail, didn't. He singled out one other person and including the 'Nerjin is scum' thing at the time led me to prod and poke it.
I addressed it (bottom of page please), and was not answered at all from him in the proceeding posts. Later on, he shifts on a neutral basis "If Tiruin or Toaster are the spies" and gives off the I am Town because My PM Said So deal "I know I'm town-..." thing.
Why I know there's one spy, and why I declare that all this is moot if I'm a spy is this case. Spies had one day, regardless of timezones, to plan up. Now if I was a spy, there is a whole myriad of things I could do with that upvoted mission - it could contain two, heck even three spies and our plan would be for one of us to sabotage and the rest to lay low. My imagination goes even as far to believe that they have a SoP (standard operating procedure) regarding the case if [SPY > 2] in a mission, there is an order of who to sabotage and who to not sabotage.
But yeah, it basically all boils down to that fact. Toaster addressed the idea with neutrality, a certain speculation coming from one who sincerely cares. Leafsnail didn't give anything but wavering reads and labels. If the latter was town, he'd at least
do something unlike what the former did, so hence me leading to the idea that there was one scum.
What else below this is just added musing:
And now I get what you were coming at with the 'knowing too much' case. Town are at a disadvantage - at this rate, we have to get this perfect until the 5th mission - relying on a 5/6 basis of spotting town instead of scum. Now, why would this person [me] go ahead and keep on stating that there was one spy in the first mission? Is she defending something, or is there anything else up? I'm acting on two core principles which are stated above. They are that I know I'm town - this is hard to explain, yeah. And the second is reasoning post-mission.
Spies could go ahead and give the third and fourth mission entirely, only to compromise it in the fifth, was my idea. T'would be a waste of time, but putting in all variables for the win would lead to this. Leading to my worry about the current state of affairs and...well, as you put it, tugging on any string to correct people's eyesight.
Still goes to show how much I've to do in talking to others in English :/
Don't use this as any basis in decision, please. Its just me saying it out.
Still,
pick Toaster because he's the only other person I'm sure of in being town other than Toony and Ford.
PPE: Ouch.