Leaf:
No. Him not receiving a rebel role PM could have been the deciding factor if another thing hadn't already beaten it to being the deciding factor.
Except this is crap. The role PM issue occurred
before his random team, so how could the random team beat it?
Ford:
NQT stuff
Hm. I suppose you have a point on the cracking bit- if you want to take his word on it, fine. I don't agree with taking his word on it at all, because I've seen cagey players (WUBA comes to mind) pretty much do the same thing as scum. NQT does seem to play more on logic than emotion, so it'd be a surprise move from him.
If you want to trust him over it, fine, but don't expect anyone else to do so.
Tiruin:
Trust > why did it drop.
Gut, really. Leaf's really hard to nail down, and I'm starting to feel like he's manipulating things.
On the rest...I give up. Personally, I can't explain it anymore than anyone else is without just blatantly saying I'm town. I know that I didn't sabotage my own mission (because that would be the stupidest move ever made judging from long term goals and the current logic of that day)
And I'm sure that there was only one spy on that mission. What there is to misunderstand is how to perpetrate who laid back and who sabotaged - real hard to do. One thing is, nobody can be silenced via death or roleflip. No emotions can be seen other than what we say in words, and even that is fallible to formatting.
Holy crap do you sound like JanusTwoFace there.
So you're saying he's "confirmed" scum because there was only one sabotage, and if there were two spies, they would both sabotage?
Who would you pick as a team right now?
NQT:
I care and that's what matters here. I'm staking my reliability as a player in general on this point. It doesn't matter to me whether other people say they care about trustworthiness- I care.
I would expect any clever player to be willing to make a claim like that as scum. No one holds you accountable outside the game for blatant boldface whopper lies you tell ingame.