PFPI do enjoy how people play a game where no roleflips occur like a mafia one - reading someone stating an opinion contradictory to their own as suspicious/scum-like. I'll just shorten this post away from any emotions I have or stuff.
ToonyManAlso, the second statement is up for fallibility. He could've organized a team with spies in it, but then they would've laid low just to put the assumption that he's clean
If the spies laylow on the first mission then they're making a really bad move.
I don't really like this though, I'd much prefer if the team we organize we actually have fairly confident town reads instead of putting people with suspicions in there. If I were you Tiruin I would put myself and two people I could see not being spies.
So let's go on with the next team:
Tiruin
Toaster
Leafsnail
Fine, I'll up-vote this.
Why do you fine lying low on the first mission a bad move? It can give the idea that the team was fully town aligned.
On the second, I note a sense of apprehension in the 'Fine...'
Could you say why you upvoted that list?
[...]And while Tiruin's posts always bother the hell out of me[...]
And dude, look. If you've any problem with my posts/playstyle, could you at least tell me what they are? Always is such a harsh word when used here. All I want to do is to play a game wherein my quirks don't affect me in a holistic way. While I could just drop a 'this annoys me', I want this kind of labeling to end. What the hell is your problem with me anyway?
NQTSure Nerjin: best case scenario, Tiruin, Leafsnail and Toaster are all spies (100%), and the remaining 6 of us are 0% spy. Worst case scenario, only one of them is a spy, leaving two spies among the remaining six of us, or 33%. Mathematically, there's a higher range of possible spies among Tiruin, Leafsnail and Toaster than the rest of. Thus, we should exclude them from the next mission. The chances will obviously change when we get the results of the next mission, but right now it would be downright idiotic to put forward any of those three.
Take my word for this - whether I'm town or scum, it doesn't matter - there was one spy. I'll be clarifying this later. (I mean, I would say that I'm town here but by the looks of such, that's pretty fallible)
Query though: What do you think of the team suggested, and who do you feel is scum at the moment? What I see from most of your posts is a neutral-confirmative viewpoint, wherein you're trying to piece together who is what from their stances.
Dariush: I request you to replace
Leafsnail with
Yourself in the list.
I've searched through the thread on what I think are pertinent examples of why you're against putting the team leader in the team and found:
Dariush: Mission two, four people go out, and there are two sabotages. Mission one was a success, and one of the three people on mission one went on mission two. How do you gauge the four mission two people?
What do you mean, how do I gauge them? I know that among them is one person who is at least 66% likely to be scum and that whoever organized or approved of the team is either an idiot or scum, because there's really no sane reason to do so, since if the repeater is scum, then he basically handed the scumteam the victory.
Take yourself out and put someone else there. I'm not voting in support with this group otherwise. We should have a rule where the team organizer can not nominate themselves, this would put restrictions on the spy team, especially later in the game. The freedom fighters do not suffer from this (unless we've confirmed every spy somehow and then this rule is silly, but then again the game would pretty much be decided).
I vote for this suggestion. Actually, before Nerjin's post I thought this was enforced by the mod. The leader's task is (if he is a rebel, obviously) to help town (and himself) learn the alignments of other people, since he already knows his own.
ZU:
Dariush: Why did you up vote?
Simply put, I don't think spies would contend themselves with the first result rolled. It's more a gut feeling than anything else that they woud try to manipulate the result to get a certain set of people while making the result look random. Also, I despise Toony's shameless tunneling attempts, so that automatically raises my opinion of Nerjin.
Also, I wonder why you read Leafsnail as town over toony after calling the former out for WIFOM
hereDownvoting that list btw. I believe Leafsnail is scum, and you're trying to push a 2nd Spy sabotage at the moment. Regardless of being connected or not, let's put this situation in which I'm town:
You brought leafsnail - one of two suspects that I as the leader have no idea is a spy - over ToonyMan, something which goes against your principles of finding scum via your methods mentioned above.
I mean, while you've a
feeling that ToonyMan is scum, you're not acting upon the 'give everyone a chance' idea you're leaning upon. To forward my opinion of you, you declaimed me as scum just because of an
opinion of Nerjin.
If I can request your opinion (in a holistic manner), why would I defend my scumbuddy like so in the post you picked about? Why, exactly (provide a quote please) do you think Nerjin is scum?
And in another way (not hypothetical), do you believe that I'm connected with Nerjin? Why? Because I believe he's town or...
Lastly
Swap LS and yourself out for anybody who isn't Toony (or Nerjin, for that matter), or else I'm downvoting.
I noted that your attitude towards LS has been mostly vague at the time of this post, but you somehow warmed up to him and added him to the team now,
Why the mistrust of LS before?
> No roleflips.
> Everyone can speak until game end - 5 missions with differing team picks and leaders.
Now, while people may develop scum/town reads on everyone else, the determining factor is in the teams picked.
If the team leader includes him/herself in the team, this narrows down the concluding results into the number of people chosen (3 team > 3 suspects) without inserting the opportunity for a scum leader to pick a spy, or a town leader to pick a spy. If the leader is scum, he'll be incriminating himself if he doesn't pick another buddy, or has to defend his stand if he goes alone. If its a town leader, then there's no hurt in picking the other two, as you are town yourself, the only other suspects are the ones you pick and therefore they're where you should focus.
Pretty much easy to quantify, actually.
Think0028: If you're alive at all, the lurkertracker is still suffering from that <class 'sqlite3.IntegrityError'> hiccup D:
So I had a nosebleed in fixing everything and every post...
PPE: Dar.
AW COME ON. I had to manually search your posts and you post RIGHT NOW?! Added a sentence to the above (apologies if this post is unorganized - currently stressed, busy and fearing for my blood pressure)
... :/