Two reasons why it's really weird that Tiruin would want to promote Toaster:
1. If I was town and on a failing team with two other people, those two other people would be a lot more suspicious to me than everyone else.
2. Toaster and Tiruin have voted completely differently on every vote. On votes alone, they don't agree on anything!
3. Tiruin knows who else is the scum on the M1 team but nobody else believes that.
4. Tiruin is spy. Always scum. Therefore Toaster is a better choice.
5. Tiruin has been illogical and confusing from the start! Oh goodness, spies should learn to play safe harder!
6. Toaster is spy too? Possibility confirmed.
7. #s 3-6 work as a satirical note on what I've seen people 'out' me as scum by. And people believe it. Huh.
But really, you know the person with higher chances of being upvoted and less likely to be scum (talking, obviously, from the general viewpoint) is him. I keep on pushing the notion that there is one spy on M1, and there is. Somehow, and on a funny note, people allude that to me
calling myself out! (As the standard, those who've issued that statement have no reasons behind it. Again. I'm leaving the question on
why right here, but I expect to be ignored - just like in the previous pages.)
I'm just wondering why those people are mainly ToonyMan and Toaster, two people who score Town in my eyes. Now, the list of people-who-score that number have also been labelled as null, which somehow others (I believe that's you, Ford?) have been confused over? Clarify: Null reads are put under the Town folder. I cannot assume those [in general] are scum without conclusive evidence. This is not Mafia. The principle of Mafia is still present, but that kind of thinking doesn't help here.
@1: Not really. Those two other people rank as null in my eyes. Considering the fact that there are 3 spies - 3/9 people,
@2: That's one of the things I'm pointing out. Why does vote correlation mean I'm town, he's town, I'm scum, he's scum, or any of these variables interchanged and mixed? Vote correlation is the very thing I've poked you about when you first issued my name up for the team. It either also signifies differing opinion: something I believe townies have in contest with each other, manipulated mostly by other people's words.
8. No I'm not, ever, going to go under the assumption that Toaster
and Leafsnail are both spies. One thing is, even though people offered the idea up, nobody tries to prove it and instead falls back to the one-spy-M1 thing. Due to the large number of people talking, and no time limit, many drop an "I think you're scum" without pertinent reasons why. It's like a one way opinion; 'And then what', comes to mind as there is no continuation with that sort of conversation.
2a. Toaster has, in an interesting way, labelled me as STRONG SCUM in his 'gut reads'. I've asked him for reasons why. Up until now, he hasn't come up with any of them. - this pokes at my thinking that he's being Town, or just lazying around given his past record of playing. Just to state, LS ranks higher on my list for the reasons I've already mentioned.
Now can you just please shift me for Toaster ZU, because I'm really getting tired of reasoning with declarative and not interrogative sentences, thanks.
NQT: Given #1, why do you think those other two people are more suspicious than everyone else - especially when the everyone else part has my suspects (those who I've suspected precluding this) instead of them?
#2: I see you're following your Logician profession, much like the previous game we've played in. How does vote correlation work between townies, in a hypothetical situation? Two townies. I'm asking this to see how you view it, so please be honest here.
Author
Topic: Viva la Revolucion! Game Over, man, Game over! (Read 131845 times)