"I'm afraid the Empire of Tranquility will cream us if we don't."
"It would improve my worshiper's lives."
These Two sound like valid reasons to me, but the full threat of the Empire hasn't been reveiled to us yet. we have heared about it, but we haven't witnessed or experienced it. when that happens perhaps our responses can become more extreme.
1. It's not extreme to voluntarily alter the offspring of a few women.
2. A handful of Justicars nearly defeated our best warriors. Those Justicars were sent to retrieve a few fugitives. Their total forces (admittedly not all Justicars, but still) number in the millions. Oh, and they're done with the last of the old chaos gods, so we and Krait are probably next.
We have about 50 people, plus a few swarms of firejackets, a hundred Stems and change, some Saps, some miscellaneous powerful beasts, and a few allies who aren't much more powerful than us.
if it would improve the worshipers lives, it really depends on the kinds of modifications, if the followers would like to be changed then thats doable. would they be viewed as freaks by the rest of the world?
Or would they be seen as blessed?
Quote from: Talvara on Today at 08:49:00 pm
but it all sounds pretty evil to me.
Why?
This is about borrowing a womb for your experiments, or experimenting on a child in the first place.
If the woman is aware of the issues and consents, I fail to see why it's Evil.
If it's nonconsensual...yeah, problem.
I even suggested extending our worshipers' lives and making them unnaturally healthy. Sounds like a fair trade to me.
As far as Donut's reasoning; In my mind he wants to improve the lives of his followers and protect them as much as possible and would see altering them to do so as just a natural means to an end. He wouldn't see it as evil because change and evolution are just an aspect of normal life and he is a god of life and chaos so speeding that along is just in his nature and not really any different from making people into golems, werewolves or snakepeople like our allied chaos god has. He wouldn't necessarily want to do it against their will though because even though he feels it's the right thing to do, he doesn't want to push his views on others unless absolutely necessary.
But seriously as many other people have pointed out, a lot of gods have modified followers.
what if we rolled a one? would that possibility be acceptable to us? I personally don't think so.
Given the low probability of such horrible failure, the high rewards of success (and the ego Donut's chaotic personality meshes with his other successes with Life to form) probably make it reasonable to him. And us.
another thing, changing your followers to your whims (not saying that you're suggesting that) implies that you'd view them as your playthings.
"To your whims"? Oh, sorry to dare want them to live longer and healthier.
Grumamajaskdfalgh created the Orcs, if that idiot can so can we
Who said that?
Maher did.
EDIT: Is it odd that I imagine Maher being Irish?
EDIT 2: GM also said that it is possible to make your own full fledged race.
can you get me a link for edit 2?
the 'race gods' might be special and primordial.
Well, we made Saps, didn't we? It shouldn't be too hard (in principle) to turn humans into soulled Buds, or to give souls in the Afterlife to Stems (making Soul Stems), or something.
Sentience, free will, a soul
Correct on all counts, except that Free Will affects worship proportionally. Little bit of Free Will = 1/4 Mana from that soul. No Free Will of course means zero mana.
And before someone asks, it's not possible to go over 100% Free Will
Here you go
alright, thanks. I think our interpretations differ. From this (I went back and looked if there was more context) I don't really read that its possible for us to make a full fledged race.
if anything its a maybe.
I really can't imagine us being able to create a soul though. but to be fair I don't recall it being said that we couldn't create a soul either.
I'd imagine that, while it's not easy, it's possible. Races exist; surely they came from somewhere?