I thus move that we do not act upon Jbyg except when he acts upon us, and then in opposite measure. I am finding this constant conflict to be tedious, and do not want this to become a new AADD.
Aye to the new proposal.
Aye to the new proposal.
As has been previously pointed out, our condemning Jebyg doesn't mean anything in and of itself; I see it as a sort of warning. It also makes it easier to assign punishments.
I also propose we let GWG set Jbg's punishment. He has no fondness of the god, but will be fair.
Well, everyone seems fine with not punishing him yet, so...when I feel we ought to, I'll suggest a punishment. I refuse to have any powers beyond my actual powers, plus of course my position as moderator and secretary of the Synod. If you want to give me 100% power for determining punishment? Start a motion for it and don't be surprised when I vote nay. In an actual emergency, a single person with power would be useful, but otherwise, no.
...Although the power to set up a temporary "dictator" like Rome did could be useful...
Laws:
1. Any being, whether a power, a servant to a power, a mortal, or whatever may be condemned by a 2/3 or greater vote of the organization; a condemned being may be absolved by a simple majority vote.
2. A condemned being which has not subsequently been absolved is subject to any punishments agreed on by a majority of the group.
3. Any rules may be changed by a two-thirds majority vote after a suggestion by a member power.
4. No being may be prosecuted for punishing said being's own servants for infractions of the being's laws or orders.
Members:[/u]
GreatWyrmGold (Draco)
Inithis (Inithis)
Rancor (look this up)
Vgray (Azem)
The Condemned:
Jebyg, No Punishment Assigned