Show me something that merits my apology, and it will be speedily forthcoming. I'm still interested in more updates, and I would like to expedite them in whatever way possible. However, it is true that my suspension of disbelief was broken. It's true that it felt as though player decisions had no role in the outcomes. I can't give a sincere apology for these impressions or the circumspect way that I voiced them.
I can think of a couple of things you could apologize for, namely refusing to at least give Mal the benefit of the doubt, and getting caught up in "anachronism," when explosives, though not present in the real-world middle ages, have been used fairly often in medieval fiction, and seem plausible to anyone who hasn't decided to take "this is how it happened in the real world" like 50 steps too far.
I dont think Gav would have a problem with the explosives part had they actually been foreshadowed or there had, at some point, being a reference to 'small iron balls' or something that let us know the Sea Raiders had them.
The main problem is not explosive its the fact that their had lost their supply trains, had no access to the river, no access to the sea, no access to friendly land, no access to their allies and no way of getting something like grenades fro our land, which all begs the question:
Just WHERE did they get them?That is what has broken my suspension of disbelief.
Add into it the fact that whilst we were building up Feroshire, we went through a phase of which the outcome was the agreement that anything more than a few decades within our current time frame (which i assume is somewhere between the late 1300's and the late 1400's) cannot be used. The grenade type weapons the Sea Raiders some how acquired should not be around till the 1800's at the earliest, a good 400 years later.
Let alone the fact that the Sea Raiders are so averse to metallurgy that they use shoddy weapons and wear little to no armour which means they couldn't have made them. And, even if they had them since the start of their campaign, why didn't they use them in the Second Siege of Torchester? or the siege of the nations Capital? With the amount of explosives you would have to use to stop a cavalry charge, you could have blown a hole the size of Alaska in them and been into the city in no time.
But, instead, they decide to wait around outside, get hammered by a Ducal relief force and then encircled by more reinforcements? Unbelievable.
And as for regents, if Mal is following the medieval laws, Marna may not be able to act as regent due to being female. We know no other male nobles (because a regent has to be a noble) that could act as regent for our son. Therefore, our lands would be given to someone else on our death. UNLESS the Duke survived and is acting as our regent, which is possible due to the Duke being a blood relative of Marna and also a close ally to us.
I love this thread. I think Mal is a fantastic GM. But i cant just stand by whilst the story is flipped upside down, possibly setting us all the way back to square one. The last two updates had more (plot) holes in than Swiss cheese after a shotgun blast.