Uh huh... now explain how that fits into humans being a single species who constantly pass genes amongst ourselves. Or did you forgot that little fact? Maybe you'll next try to deflect into the realm of biological determinism and say that all people who fit into your narrow little worldview are the ones who become feminists, despite how views on this political stance may change throughout life.
And why the fuck is it that female feminists are only threatened while male feminists are rushing into the fray to protect them? Who can't see how horribly screwed up that view is?
Sure, the need to protect "our women" is pretty much universal, even in me. Whether it's a well-guarded harem
(yes, I know they're not guarding them for women's welfare, but they're still guarding them from outside threats, as in, other men), men throwing themselves on their girlfriends in a Batman movie premiere shooting or male armies in every part of the world
("But men are more physical on average, therefore more efficient soldiers." I'm going to regret saying this, but women could be used as a cannon fodder if we didn't care for them.). Some don't seem to want to recognize this as a biological trait. Most feminists seem to want to deny evo-psy outright, which to me seems foolish. Sure, our political views drift
because we're not slaves to our biology, as long as we're aware of it.
And as for your last part, I'm not sure if I understood it correct. Why aren't male feminists threatened? They most likely are, but it's not considered masculine to make a ruckus when you're in trouble. It's a sign of weakness.
But like I said, I have no competence on this subject
(I doubt many of us here do either), therefore whatever I say has no real weight and you're free to dismiss it
(without an insult, thank you). People seemed to take offense to the evo-psy comment, which is why I threw it out there.
One could make an evo-psy argument to why feminists scream "victim" the loudest, however.
One, as in a person who has actually studied these subjects, who is not me.
(Psst, internet education does not count.)It would be for the benefit of others, not your own. I'll do it if others show interest. You can parse your own grammar, if you need to convince yourself.
You just said I wasn't interested in learning more! Now I'm showing interest in what I did wrong, so I may improve. Of course it needs an outside observer to point out the errors in my behavior. But yeah, that's not the topic here.