Whose life has been enriched by "What would the avatar of the person above you say"?
Mine?
You sound unsure. Can you think of a specific instance? I understand that 20,000 posts in the last 2 years might be a lot to keep track of.
That was a rhetorical question mark. But yeah.
[USE_MATERIAL_TEMPLATE:POISON:CREATURE_EXTRACT_TEMPLATE]
[STATE_NAME:ALL_SOLID:frozen giant cave spider venom]
[STATE_ADJ:ALL_SOLID:frozen giant cave spider venom]
[STATE_NAME:LIQUID:giant cave spider venom]
[STATE_ADJ:LIQUID:giant cave spider venom]
[STATE_NAME:GAS:boiling giant cave spider venom]
[STATE_ADJ:GAS:boiling giant cave spider venom]
[PREFIX:NONE]
[ENTERS_BLOOD]
[SYNDROME]
[SYN_NAME:giant cave spider bite]
[SYN_AFFECTED_CLASS:GENERAL_POISON]
[SYN_IMMUNE_CREATURE:SPIDER_CAVE:ALL]
[SYN_INJECTED]
[HAIR_EYES:SEV:100:PROB:100:RESISTABLE:SIZE_DILUTES:START:5:PEAK:10:END:20]
Back from the days where I had my dwarvatar with the huge eyebrows. That was kinda clever.
Yeah, that was an okay joke, somewhat stymied by the fact that it no longer works when reread on the 11000 post thread.
Due to avatar changes, the vast majority of posts are nonsensical and pointless. The fact that you had to explain it to me
speaks wonders of it's continued existence.
also
That was a rhetorical question mark. But yeah.
Did you just profess that you responded to a rhetorical question with
another rhetorical question that you designated as rhetorical
by adding a question mark? That was a rhetorical question mind you because it's what you just did. My inquiry is what indication the question mark
was supposed to give to the rhetorical nature of the response. It means the same thing without the question mark. I am also curious
as to how you would intend to communicate verbally that this is a rhetorical question when it is one word that means exactly the same thing no matter how you inflect it. Would "No, you weren't" not be an appropriate answer regardless of your intent? Was that a rhetorical question? Is this?
This is bothering me way more than it should.