Please let's not take this discussion as a reason to snipe at people.
This is sorta why I'm not really comfortable with sharing my views. Not understanding a persons position seems to default to the worst thing one can assume about said position. I'm not really trained in debate, so getting hotly engaged with people who seem well versed in such would be unwise if they are itching more for a debate than an understanding.
This does make me anticipate the eventual "What is love?" thread though.
As someone who's made his anti-democracy, pro-eugenic, and generally "out-there" view on morality and self concept fairly well known, I feel that a large part of the reaction will come from your
approach to introducing your concepts. If it's in the form of "I would like to explain why I believe what I believe", and you have at least halfway decent and relatively honest response, the response will (generally) be good. Especially if you aren't trying to cast explicit judgements on other forum-goers.
If it's in the form of "this is how it is", and your argument uses loaded languages, seems purposely confusing, is generally aggressive (I DARE YOU TO DISAGREE WITH ME), relies on the audience accepting assumptions they don't agree with or actively reject (only relevant if you are trying to convince others instead of just explain yourself), you attack other people's beliefs instead of just putting forward your own, you make statements blatantly contradictory to reality without explanation or justification (only black people voted for Nobama!), or it seems like you are being insincere, then you are going to have a bad time. (And I'm not saying all of that has happened in this thread, but those are the sort of things that seem to set people off).
And never, ever tell people "it's obvious just google it and you'll see".
* GlyphGryph shrugs.
Obviously if people agree with you they will tend to let you get away with more, but I HATE people who argue dishonestly no matter whether they agree or with me or not, and have no compunction attacking poor reasoning even if the viewpoint being pushed is one I support.