ToonyMan: Heheh, amusing theory. Bit far fetched, don't you think? Especially given:
ToonyMan:
Jack and Hapah
Plus if we follow your chain of thought it means that I have a mafiakill I can only use on alternating nights, and with a target that must be named ahead of time. Sure. But at least you're thinking out of the box and posting, unlike everyone else, so no worries. If you'd prefer I FoS someone else, let me know. Some comments on your comments:
Also note that you support Toaster instead of Dariush (who was completely set on a Mr. Celt lynch, a confirmed mafia).
At the time, Toaster did seem saner than Dariush, yes, and MrCelt wasn't "confirmed mafia" yet, as he hadn't flipped. Also, I didn't FoS anyone on D2 because I had no lynch vote (only the king did), a FoS is a threat of a vote, if one can't vote, FoS'sing is kind of pointless, yes? Plus my suspicions were fairly weak: two lurking scummy noobs, and a gut feel on Jack; given that and that it wasn't my choice anyway, I didn't feel the need.
This is a fucking half-assed post if I've ever seen one, Toaster. Two one-sentence rhetoric challenges? In three fucking days, that's all you could come up with?
You're going to side-line the fact that half the other players weren't posting at all? I think you're just picking your target here, over-aggressively.
He made a half-assed post that seemed scummy to me. Challenging him was the right thing to do. Sure, others were lurking, but I had challenged the thread at large for that already (in that same post); no one person's lurking was scummier than another at that point.
Bookthras states clearly that Hapah is scummy, but now this day when I asked Bookthras he doesn't even make a mention of him, strange isn't it?
Not that strange, since my comment about Hapah's scumminess was based on an
error, so when clarified I went back on that. Not that I'm exculpating Phantom/Hapah, but at least their comments are consistent after all, when I earlier thought they hadn't been. I'm not saying one or the other is surely town, but after that clarification Zombie climbed on my suspicion list (which already had MBP (my vote target from D3) and Jack (my scummiest gut feel but thin case)), so I focused on those first.
MBP:For your answer Book, i'm pretty sure its a SK. [...] SK can happen, but the lack of kills is annoying. Delayed kill could be the way too. Still, rather unlikely, 2 SK is almost but not quite crazytown as far as town being screwed.
So, are you pretty sure or aren't you? Isn't the lack of other kills, that you yourself cite, enough of an argument against it to temper that "pretty sure"? If it was an arsonist/delayed kill, who do you think it is and why?
Other situations would be a more special wincons, like some kind of lyncher, or a miller. That would my guess.
But a lyncher (or brother or survivor or outsider or ally or jester or martyr) wouldn't block the town win if it had majority and the scum were killed, would they? So would
this be your guess or would the "pretty sure" above be it? Do you think Leaf and/or Toaster were actual scum? Both? Neither? Why?
Also, please anwer
all my questions:
As for suspicions, MBP and Zombie are at the top at the moment. I would like both to give their reads on the situation, what do they think about remaining factions, top suspicions and any information they can share. Jack, you too please.
Your top suspicions, with reasons, and any information you can share, please.
Everyone: let's see some fucking posting already.