Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Tiruin]

Ahahaha...

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA

ToonyMan was scum all along - And I was right on that Crossbowman theory!

Toaster is a damned loyalist as derived by his convoluted scheme.

Leafsnail is most probably also a Traitor, with a brilliant mind to boot!

Jim is next in line for the second Loyalist, a silent man without the loot!

Thrice-damn this pouch of gold. Cursed be the one on the throne! I am sick and tired of all these lies! I am dying to death on the sake of a spy!

My name is tarnished, my reputation, gone. The Prince who neverwas still stands in silence, prolonged.

He did not act when we killed in his name. Well, no more! IronyOwl.

To hell with this game!

IronyOwl, your silence is no Justice. This whole farce against my life isn't worth it. If we could target the middleman, sure. But there's no trace of our contractor and thief.

My words carried no weight. They fell on deaf ears. How much can I care for this bunch of peers.

Nothing is right. Everything is wrong. So what-in-bloody-heck, I'm making this a haphazard song.

Well, I couldn't kill them both.

Oh yes you can, you wayward guard. Your sword spoke your word, how true is your ward?

Gotta make sure Tiruin goes first right?  I still don't see how lowering the health of swordsmen is a bad idea...

Unblockable attack IronyOwl.  If you're really a traitor Tiruin then screw you.  At least Toaster let me live for another turn, thanks dude.

You addle-minded fool. You insidious jerk. All logic is wasted on your cowardly smirk. A crossbowman, sure, with your tale to prove. You shoot from afar and don't mind my moves.

Hey look, let's speak. Who made up this plan? The swordsman is damned, let's have picked Tiruin!

Insult me on terms too personal to speak, let's piss him off again just for my reap!

Ab asino lanam! Was my case not that obvious?

[Tiruin]

P.S.

"LET'S KILL THE SWORDSMAN, LIFE IS AT STAKE!"

And you expect yourself not to get attacked for that? For this irrational idea?

Quod Erat Demonstrandum ToonyMan. Q.E.- Frickin'- D.

[IronyOwl]

Well then.

Defend Self

Attack Tiruin


You were right, Toony. I didn't like you or Tiruin, but I wasn't confident enough to dispose of you. Fatal error.

[Leafsnail]

Defend IronyOwl.  Attack ToonyMan.

Even if Toaster is the last traitor IronyOwl can only take 2 damage today, and none at all tomorrow.  Thus he can't make the attack today, so we just need to kill Toaster and take a hitpoint off me and Jim to make the game an absolute win.

[Leafsnail]

EBWOP: 2HP, we can't stop the Prince taking a hit from ToonyMan.

[Jim Groovester]

Have all blockable attacks been blocked?

I guess I'll wait to see what Toaster does.

[Toaster]

Well Jim, looks like you must be the last badman.  I banked too hard on them killing each other.  (COUGH IRONY WAY TO DO NOTHING I WOULD HAVE KILLED THE OTHER)

Toony's acted:  UNBLOCKABLE Irony
Tiruin's acted:  Attack Irony, Attack Irony
Irony's acted:  Defend Irony, Attack Tiruin
Leaf's acted:  Defend Irony, Attack ToonyMan

Net:  Unblockable on Irony, Attack on Tiruin, Attack on Toony



Just me and Jimbo, at a Mexican standoff.  If I attack him, he attacks Irony and saves one or the other.  If I send extra-fatal hits at Toony/Tiruin, he attacks Irony. 

Conversely, if Jim attacks Irony I can just counter whatever he does.  So neither of us wants to act first.

So make your move, Traitor boy!  My blade wishes to taste your flesh.

[Leafsnail]

You should both use your attacks now on ToonyMan and Tiruin to prevent deadline screwing.

[Toaster]

If he's a shieldman, he could still save one.


If he stalls his next post, I'll have to do that, I guess.

[Jim Groovester]

I am a Shieldman, and since defending is reactionary and Toaster can attack twice I'm forced to wait for Toaster so he doesn't try anything tricky.

Toaster, let's do this one step at a time.

You commit your first attack on ToonyMan

Then I'll commit mine on Tiruin.

Then you'll commit your second attack on to me.

Then I'll defend against it.

This way, there's no way ToonyMan and Tiruin can make it out of today alive, and there's no way any either of us can do anything tricky like sneak in an attack on IronyOwl or try and save either of them without the other being able to do something about it.

Is this plan agreeable?

[Leafsnail]

I'll release the hostages at the predesignated spot after you complete those actions.

[Toaster]

I must consider everything you say suspicious and untrustworthy.


Meph:  Can you defend against an attack made by yourself?

[Toaster]

Actually, I don't see any way you'd follow through with that, since the next day everyone would attack you and you would be dead, or half dead with your actions spent, dying the next day.

[Leafsnail]

Huh?

[Toaster]

I'm saying if Jim did what he said he'd do, he'd guarantee himself a loss.


Meph:  Since we're in a reactive game situation with a deadline, can Jim and I both agree that any action either takes would be to counter any action made by the other?