Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Poll

n/a

n/a
- 0 (0%)
n/a
- 0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 0


Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] 14 15 ... 72

Author Topic: EoFS Revisited - 50027AD (Year 72) - Closing discussion  (Read 70191 times)

Il Palazzo

  • Bay Watcher
  • And lo, the Dude did abide. And it was good.
    • View Profile
Re: EoFS Revisited - 4965AD (Year 9) Election time. Remember to abstain.
« Reply #180 on: December 22, 2012, 03:08:02 pm »

Turn sent.
Logged

Kebooo

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: EoFS Revisited - 4965AD (Year 9) Election time. Remember to abstain.
« Reply #181 on: December 22, 2012, 03:46:03 pm »

Turn sent.
Logged

Aqizzar

  • Bay Watcher
  • There is no 'U'.
    • View Profile
Re: EoFS Revisited - 4965AD (Year 9) Election time. Remember to abstain.
« Reply #182 on: December 22, 2012, 04:48:03 pm »

Has another Convent of Regency been called already?  Would that there could be a single force in the galaxy to be trusted with such authority, even the Imperial Guard itself.  Praise be to the Pancreator for blessing the Imperium with a bureaucracy so devoted to slavish worship of its instructions that no general could seize the Guard's for himself, at least before so poor nobleman gives him reason to act.

And so again, Hawkwood abstains, as does every House.  It could be called a gentleman's agreement, if any member could be called anything like gentle, and if the price of deviance were anything less than mutual destruction.  Perhaps, in another decade, another generation, another century, there might be reason enough to risk otherwise.


Turn sent.

By the way, I was looking at the scoreboard.  Kebooo, where are you getting all those cities?  It never ceases to amaze me how terrible I am at 4X games for how much practice I've had at them.
Logged
And here is where my beef pops up like a looming awkward boner.
Please amplify your relaxed states.
Quote from: PTTG??
The ancients built these quote pyramids to forever store vast quantities of rage.

Kebooo

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: EoFS Revisited - 4965AD (Year 9) Election time. Remember to abstain.
« Reply #183 on: December 22, 2012, 04:55:00 pm »

I have my strategies. Keep in mind I've played this game since it was released, long, long ago. I feel as though I've pretty much come close to the min/max wall of the early game. But later on when there are so many cities, so many units, so many possibilities, that advantage goes away.
Logged

Aqizzar

  • Bay Watcher
  • There is no 'U'.
    • View Profile
Re: EoFS Revisited - 4965AD (Year 9) Election time. Remember to abstain.
« Reply #184 on: December 22, 2012, 05:15:51 pm »

I have my strategies. Keep in mind I've played this game since it was released, long, long ago. I feel as though I've pretty much come close to the min/max wall of the early game. But later on when there are so many cities, so many units, so many possibilities, that advantage goes away.

I'm just wondering how to build up 100 food and metal with the kind of frequency needed to expand like that.  Not to give too much away, but while I'm sure I'm not expanding as fast as I could be, I don't see how I could be growing all that much quicker.
Logged
And here is where my beef pops up like a looming awkward boner.
Please amplify your relaxed states.
Quote from: PTTG??
The ancients built these quote pyramids to forever store vast quantities of rage.

Il Palazzo

  • Bay Watcher
  • And lo, the Dude did abide. And it was good.
    • View Profile
Re: EoFS Revisited - 4965AD (Year 9) Election time. Remember to abstain.
« Reply #185 on: December 22, 2012, 05:17:12 pm »

I have a vague recollection of reading somewhere about hospitals' effect on unit healing rates, but I can't seem to find it anymore. Does anybody know how they work or can direct me to the source?
Logged

Aqizzar

  • Bay Watcher
  • There is no 'U'.
    • View Profile
Re: EoFS Revisited - 4965AD (Year 9) Election time. Remember to abstain.
« Reply #186 on: December 22, 2012, 05:20:37 pm »

I have a vague recollection of reading somewhere about hospitals' effect on unit healing rates, but I can't seem to find it anymore. Does anybody know how they work or can direct me to the source?

I honestly don't, except for a vague recollection of that being another mechanic that doesn't actually work as advertised.

I'd be interested to know too, I have a tank unit that hasn't healed a hitpoint in five turns of garrisoning.
Logged
And here is where my beef pops up like a looming awkward boner.
Please amplify your relaxed states.
Quote from: PTTG??
The ancients built these quote pyramids to forever store vast quantities of rage.

Il Palazzo

  • Bay Watcher
  • And lo, the Dude did abide. And it was good.
    • View Profile
Re: EoFS Revisited - 4965AD (Year 9) Election time. Remember to abstain.
« Reply #187 on: December 22, 2012, 05:24:13 pm »

I only found out that a unit in a city should heal 12% of its health, vs 2% outside.
Logged

Margrave

  • Bay Watcher
  • ...You up for a little unsanctioned mining?
    • View Profile
Re: EoFS Revisited - 4965AD (Year 9) Election time. Remember to abstain.
« Reply #188 on: December 22, 2012, 05:30:32 pm »

Turns sent.
Logged

Kebooo

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: EoFS Revisited - 4965AD (Year 9) Election time. Remember to abstain.
« Reply #189 on: December 22, 2012, 06:11:17 pm »

Aqizzar, a lot of my city count is from conquering cities, not from engineers. I have probably built seven or eight cities from engineers.

This was a basic guide I wrote for the game a few years ago, some may find it useful, especially those new to the game: http://s235607088.onlinehome.us/EFS/

No mention of the hospital statistics, which I don't recall off the top of my head any longer. What I do know is that there is no benefit to building more than two. I may be wrong, but I believe they add either an additional 4% to healing per turn (an equal amount both in and out of cities) planet wide, or 10%. Something like that. I damage myself in doing so, but there is no reason not to build two hospitals on every world that you have a significant military presence.
Logged

Aqizzar

  • Bay Watcher
  • There is no 'U'.
    • View Profile
Re: EoFS Revisited - 4965AD (Year 9) Election time. Remember to abstain.
« Reply #190 on: December 22, 2012, 06:24:57 pm »

Aqizzar, a lot of my city count is from conquering cities, not from engineers. I have probably built seven or eight cities from engineers.

Yeah, that's where most of my growth has been as well.  It's just that all the starting planets have about the same number of rebel cities and I'm already blitzing another planet while building engineers at home.  It seems like I'm growing about as fast as I could.

By the by, reading that guide: I assume we're all playing by the same interpretation of the Nova house rules, and nobody is abusing the AI?  Like, the complete tithe skimming thing?
« Last Edit: December 22, 2012, 06:31:40 pm by Aqizzar »
Logged
And here is where my beef pops up like a looming awkward boner.
Please amplify your relaxed states.
Quote from: PTTG??
The ancients built these quote pyramids to forever store vast quantities of rage.

Kebooo

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: EoFS Revisited - 4965AD (Year 9) Election time. Remember to abstain.
« Reply #191 on: December 22, 2012, 07:09:08 pm »

I've never been in a game where everyone didn't raise the tithe, or else there is no purpose to churches and controlling them.

I hope this doesn't compromise me diplomatically, but I believe I control more than one city on six planets. I use frigates early in the game to land next to "lone" cities to discover if they are farms or mines. I will capture a farm first for a planet I'm attacking, then go after all the farms/mines that aren't in PTS range. I also will risk one of my nobles early in the game due to their effectiveness against the weak rebel stacks. Sometimes it bites me in the ass, but 95% of the time it is worth it. So I aggressively expand, take every mine/farm I can, and sell valuable resources (gems/exotica) that I won't use for a long time to the league so that I can purchase as much food and metal as I can. I suppose it can only make for more interesting games to divulge some of my secrets. Also, Decados starts with two air units which are extremely effective versus rebel garrisons guarding resource cities.

Also, it helps to be familiar with the resource "value" of hexes and terrain types. That way you know where you should be building mines/farms early on to maximize food/metal income.
« Last Edit: December 22, 2012, 07:20:40 pm by Kebooo »
Logged

Karlito

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: EoFS Revisited - 4965AD (Year 9) Election time. Remember to abstain.
« Reply #192 on: December 22, 2012, 07:58:25 pm »

You're supposed to raise the tithe to max under Nova rules, just not allowed to touch unit pay.
Logged
This sentence contains exactly threee erors.

Il Palazzo

  • Bay Watcher
  • And lo, the Dude did abide. And it was good.
    • View Profile
Re: EoFS Revisited - 4965AD (Year 9) Election time. Remember to abstain.
« Reply #193 on: December 22, 2012, 08:13:44 pm »

I assume we're all playing by the same interpretation of the Nova house rules, and nobody is abusing the AI?  Like, the complete tithe skimming thing?
Yeah, like others said, this is actually recommended in the "notes on play" section of the nova webpage.
http://website.lineone.net/~rwein/nova/playnotes.htm#economy
Logged

mainiac

  • Bay Watcher
  • Na vazeal kwah-kai
    • View Profile
Re: EoFS Revisited - 4965AD (Year 9) Election time. Remember to abstain.
« Reply #194 on: December 22, 2012, 09:58:44 pm »

Wow you guys are fast, now I'm the slow one!
Logged
Ancient Babylonian god of RAEG
--------------
[CAN_INTERNET]
[PREFSTRING:google]
"Don't tell me what you value. Show me your budget and I will tell you what you value"
« Last Edit: February 10, 1988, 03:27:23 pm by UR MOM »
mainiac is always a little sarcastic, at least.
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] 14 15 ... 72