Hey guys, bigotry is a two-way street. Typically with the actual bigots and the "Anti-bigots", the ones who take the opposite extreme.
The black man who expects government loans for being black is as much a bigot as the white man who believes black people should leave America.
The gay man who thinks straight people are evil is just as much a bigot as the straight man who hates gays.
The "feminists" who think Women are the betters of society are just as much of bigots as the "masculinists" who believe men are superior.
Affirmative action programs are bigoted laws.
NAACP is a bigoted organization, if they were also violent towards whites they would be as bad as the KKK.
The fact that businesses want people to learn Spanish in a predominantly English speaking community just to cater to a few, likely illegal, immigrants from Mexico is just as bigoted as the guy who thinks the immigrants should be forced to learn English.
In fact, "bigotry" is any preconceived hatred or dislike, or feeling of superiority over, a group for a characteristic, usually one out of their control. Meaning the ones who feel it is wrong to not like a trans-women after learning of it, is no better then the one who thinks it's wrong to like them at all.
However, "anti-bigotry" is almost always excused under explanations that are clearly irritating to anyone under the so called "majority" group.
MetalSlimeHunt was towards the center of the "scales", he wasn't acting like a bigot, and he had nothing against transgendered people themselves but simply the fact that he didn't want to be in a physical or romantic relationship with one as it made him uncomfortable. He is simply one of the "majority".
In fact, those who argued against him presented behavior much closer to the "anti-bigot", an equal evil, by thinking him wrong for not being attracted to someone based on their physical history he was previously unaware of.
Since nobody else decided to jump on it and move the conversation back towards the original topic, I'm going to explicitly attempt to move the discussion towards a topic I touched upon in that derail. What are, in your eyes, the essential physical qualities which make a woman a woman and a man a man? Does this standard apply universally or are there certain cis females who would be excluded by your standards, and would you still hold them despite rationally acknowledging that the universal statement about physical womanhood doesn't apply? How would you apply this standard to naturally intersex people?
I'd say genetic code was the largest determination there for me. I really don't care about what you guys think of that but as a scientifically-minded individual I cannot logically consider a trans-gendered individual as being their "new" sex. I won't discriminate against them for their choice but they just aren't a different gender because they had some bits changed.