-Was whatever caused the clusterfuck N2 a reflect, or randomization? It's a reflect, then?
-I'm guessing it had a percent chance? Can you post the wording?
-Did it do anything N3?
-Did you do anything that could have caused the Tolyk/IO contradiction N3?
In order: a) that's what I said; b) no; c) can't say; d) no.
Additionally: Are you responsible for Tiruin targeting you Night 2 instead of Hapah like he claimed?
Why did your action only reflect Hapah's action Night 2 and not mine?
Alright, just so Bookthras won't escape either his 'restriction', or something else which prevents outright claiming. (Yes this is crazy but I'm going along with what he said, because it seems too ridiculous not to...)
For Jim's first question. If No: state a four line poem. If yes: State a three line poem. There are no restrictions to how many syllables or anything nor does it have to make sense. There are no other answers but yes or no. Quote this whole paragraph just to be sure.
Bookthras: Your claim also contradicts itself.
When I sent the role, I was sort of going for a new thing: a posting restriction involving rhymes or something like that, and said as much to Wuba; I've never played a posting restriction before, and I wanted to try my hand at it. But he rightly pointed out that posting restrictions are the opposite of fun, and that if I had to rhyme too often it would get old really quickly and would probably just get me lynched regardless of anything else. He instead made me a Survivor, with the most cowardly role I've ever seen. That'll teach me.
And you think not outright claiming it would avert the bolded part?
Tiruin:
So I got the conclusion that I targeted you > hit Tibbers > got sent on my merry way to Jim along with Tibbers, as the 'me' would refer to the bearer of the teddy bear in which case would be Jim - while it does say <auto> [which would infer that it would be a personal ability, the one-shot Bear-shift would transfer the whole package], is what I concluded upon.
This is retarded but I guess it explains the most nonsensical thing I asked you about.
Just four more to go.
That did answer everything. I was under that assumption and that is where I drew my conclusions to your ideas. Ie, your questions.
In retrospect, I should've asked about the action order first. Still doesn't explain how you targeted Jim.
Alright, to the best of my abilities just to finish this madness, after the first paragraph:
> First: If Jim has Tibbers and I acted on you [thus acting on Tibbers] and the kill hit Jim, it would kill Tibbers but in that way, would also kill me because I'm protecting Tibbers.
> Second: What I made of that assertion was a minute slip based on conclusion ^. That, or insinuating that you lied [and then watching your reply for any hint of using anything else].
> Third: Anything which has that Tibbers means that Tibbers gets hit by that something. Where the word 'something' pertains to a kill.
> Fourth: I...really don't get that. I was curious on the mentioning of 'crippled scumteam' and wondered how you go onto that idea.
Now my question.
Why did you decide to not act at all?
Everyone: Thoughts?
First, I'm an idiot. Because I asked TolyK about that Binary Bomb, then looked at the claim and nodded, musing to myself on why he used it on ZU. I failed to follow it up at the time because of the conundrum with IronyOwl...
Second, I'm adding to that question list.
So, Tolyk. I'd like to know:
-Why you didn't claim Binary Bomb initially
-Why you thought using it N1 on someone who revived was the best course of action
-Why you kept casting suspicions on someone you supposedly poisoned
-What you're doing tonight, on who, in advance
Why did you use it on ZU? Why did you miss my
question here?
Also, why did you
FoS me (while not voting at all) and insinuated something without quoting what you see I did?
Why do you keep on stating my actions 'are a bit off' without explaining anything to support them?
And why did you only vote Bookthras after...well.
something like "who do you suspect"
Bookthras is being very uncooperative, seems non-town.
IronyOwl has been very logical, the only problem so far is the conflict in claims.
Jim seems to be most town-like, his pushing for claiming seems natural.
Hapah has been sick, so I don't know. He seems too laid-back, and seems more like a watcher to me (based on his last ability).
Tiruin (You) has been ok, but his reasons for actioning folks seem kind-of off.
The most scummy imo are Irony and Book. It seems that he's firm in his decision to stay silent, so I'll vote Bookthras as well when Hapah answers my question.
PFP
Read my post to Book. If we lynch town and they die we'll go into the night 2-2-1 town-scum-Book (if he's a survivor), and if that happens I'll pewpew.
Okay, that makes sense.
Bookthras, last time to claim.
Which completely evades my own question of "Why are you afraid of Hapah's action." - This is where I say that Hapah is most presumably town. He claimed the 'Big Red Button' action - Doomsday, and yet didn't withhold it. With his line of reasoning, he would've withheld it given the current outlook of things if he was non-town.
Which leaves the question on why are you afraid of his ability. Town win when all antis are dead and cannot act.
TolyK: Add this to your questions-that-should-be-answered.
Why didn't it make sense earlier? Why did you withhold your vote until then?
Author
Topic: BYOR 10 - Game Over: Town/Survivor Win (Read 78468 times)