Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 11

Author Topic: If we got FTL you would...  (Read 11758 times)

Darvi

  • Bay Watcher
  • <Cript> Darvi is my wifi.
    • View Profile
Re: If we got FTL you would...
« Reply #45 on: September 19, 2012, 03:13:54 pm »

He was talking about 0.5c, not 2c. Hence there's only half as much energy invested, not twice.
Logged

kaijyuu

  • Bay Watcher
  • Hrm...
    • View Profile
Re: If we got FTL you would...
« Reply #46 on: September 19, 2012, 03:14:17 pm »

Ah I see.
Logged
Quote from: Chesterton
For, in order that men should resist injustice, something more is necessary than that they should think injustice unpleasant. They must think injustice absurd; above all, they must think it startling. They must retain the violence of a virgin astonishment. When the pessimist looks at any infamy, it is to him, after all, only a repetition of the infamy of existence. But the optimist sees injustice as something discordant and unexpected, and it stings him into action.

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: If we got FTL you would...
« Reply #47 on: September 19, 2012, 03:15:25 pm »

Yes, but the closer you get to 1c the more exaggerated the time dilation of the accelerating entity becomes for any additional acceleration, even if you're only going from .90 to .99c.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

Darvi

  • Bay Watcher
  • <Cript> Darvi is my wifi.
    • View Profile
Re: If we got FTL you would...
« Reply #48 on: September 19, 2012, 03:16:13 pm »

You still can't make 4.5 lightyears in two years with less-than-light speed
Logged

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: If we got FTL you would...
« Reply #49 on: September 19, 2012, 03:18:26 pm »

Wait... isn't Alpha Centauri like 4 and a half lightyears from the Sun? Even at half the speed of light, it would take you less than 3 years to get there.
My brain just broke.
It's really not that complicated. Acceleration is (effectively) linear from the POV of the entity accelerating. If you double the energy pushing you forward, you reach your destination in half the time.

The speed of light and associated time dilation affects your travel time from other's POV. Your origin and destination will see you as limited by the speed of light, as far as travel time is concerned.

It's relative. Hence, "relativity."
It doesn't work like that for near relativistic speeds though. The faster you go, the more energy you need to invest, since increasing in speed increases your mass(So standing still is indeed a way of losing weight). Hence why you can't reach or pass lightspeed, as then your mass and the energy to arcelerate would be infinitif.

Also, time dilation always works from your point of view. If you were to fly to Alpha Centauri and back at light speed, almost no time would pass in your craft. On Earth, 8 years would pass.

You still can't make 4.5 lightyears in two years with less-than-light speed
In your ship it can take 2 years, but outside normal rules apply.
Logged

Darvi

  • Bay Watcher
  • <Cript> Darvi is my wifi.
    • View Profile
Re: If we got FTL you would...
« Reply #50 on: September 19, 2012, 03:20:45 pm »

In your ship it isn't 4.5 ly either. But eh.

And I studied relativity at high school, I know how it works, thank you very much.
Logged

ChairmanPoo

  • Bay Watcher
  • Send in the clowns
    • View Profile
Re: If we got FTL you would...
« Reply #51 on: September 19, 2012, 03:21:25 pm »

Is "travelling to before the Big Bang" an option?
Logged
Everyone sucks at everything. Until they don't. Not sucking is a product of time invested.

Sergius

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: If we got FTL you would...
« Reply #52 on: September 19, 2012, 03:23:40 pm »

Yeah, I had a bit of a brainfart there (I halved time, instead of doubling it :P)

Anyway, far end of milky way, let's say, that's about 75,000 years at light speed.

For the traveller, it would be effectively instantaneous.

At 0.9c, the "objective" time would still be in the same ballpark (around 83k years), but the traveller would feel about HALF of that, so about 36,000 years (according to this calculator).

At 0.9999999999c the voyager would only take about 1 "subjective" year to get there. To everyone else, it's still about 75,000 years.
« Last Edit: September 19, 2012, 03:26:54 pm by Sergius »
Logged

Darvi

  • Bay Watcher
  • <Cript> Darvi is my wifi.
    • View Profile
Re: If we got FTL you would...
« Reply #53 on: September 19, 2012, 03:24:26 pm »

Is "travelling to before the Big Bang" an option?
Weeeell, we could get beyond the background radiation, I guess that'd be sort of the same?
Logged

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: If we got FTL you would...
« Reply #54 on: September 19, 2012, 03:25:44 pm »

You still can't make 4.5 lightyears in two years with less-than-light speed
It depends on who we're talking about. The traveler can make that and more, but the observer can't.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

Darvi

  • Bay Watcher
  • <Cript> Darvi is my wifi.
    • View Profile
Re: If we got FTL you would...
« Reply #55 on: September 19, 2012, 03:26:30 pm »

Fuckin' time travel, how does it work.

No seriously, I'd like to know that.
Logged

Sergius

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: If we got FTL you would...
« Reply #56 on: September 19, 2012, 03:30:03 pm »

Fuckin' time travel, how does it work.

No seriously, I'd like to know that.

It depends on whether you're a main character or not.
Logged

Vorthon

  • Bay Watcher
  • Now with 50% more pointless rambling!
    • View Profile
Re: If we got FTL you would...
« Reply #57 on: September 19, 2012, 03:31:39 pm »

Fuckin' time travel, how does it work.

No seriously, I'd like to know that.

All I needed to now about time travel I learned from Homestuck (It's confusing as fuck) and Doctor Who (It is also fucking awesome). :P
Logged

Darvi

  • Bay Watcher
  • <Cript> Darvi is my wifi.
    • View Profile
Re: If we got FTL you would...
« Reply #58 on: September 19, 2012, 03:32:18 pm »

...ditto, plus Chrono Trigger.
Logged

kaijyuu

  • Bay Watcher
  • Hrm...
    • View Profile
Re: If we got FTL you would...
« Reply #59 on: September 19, 2012, 03:32:46 pm »

It doesn't work like that for near relativistic speeds though. The faster you go, the more energy you need to invest, since increasing in speed increases your mass(So standing still is indeed a way of losing weight). Hence why you can't reach or pass lightspeed, as then your mass and the energy to arcelerate would be infinitif.
This is false. Increasing your speed does increase your mass... but only from other's perspectives. Mass (from speed) is also relative. Remember, your speed from your own perspective is always 0.

It still takes infinite energy to "reach" c though. If you do, your time to reach your destination from any origin is literally 0. Your origin and destination will see you going c, you'll look damn similar to a singularity, and will be infinitely heavy. Fun stuff.

Is "travelling to before the Big Bang" an option?
It's impossible to go back in time. If you somehow go past the speed of light, you don't go backwards in time; you go into imaginary time (as in, square root of negative 1).
Logged
Quote from: Chesterton
For, in order that men should resist injustice, something more is necessary than that they should think injustice unpleasant. They must think injustice absurd; above all, they must think it startling. They must retain the violence of a virgin astonishment. When the pessimist looks at any infamy, it is to him, after all, only a repetition of the infamy of existence. But the optimist sees injustice as something discordant and unexpected, and it stings him into action.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 11