Mkay! I have some time now to actually do some questions.
@vodot, yeah, it was a counter-vote, I can't argue with that.
I appreciate the honesty,
Mark, but the fact that your vote was an OMGUS wasn't really in dispute. The real question is:
Why do you feel so threatened right now that you're voting for someone for absolutely no reason other than they voted for you? Here, I'll try: Is it because you know that you are absolutely the most vulnerable and overexposed player in this game, at the moment?
But then, Kamin was the second person to vote Mark, and our first bandwagoner... and he did it as a response to pressure.
unvote.
Kamin, why were you the first to cast a second vote for someone?
I thought that was evident. You should go back next time before asking a question, but here, I'll be a good sport this time.
Any town role. I'm obvious when I'm scum.
That's why. "I'm obvious when I'm scum."
Don't go after me for calling out the fact that you didn't state your reasons clearly. I know you can retroactively make explicit some implicit reason for your having voted someone, but the point is that you
didn't make it explicit when you voted... probably because you didn't really have a solid reason. You just bandwagoned him based on a feeling, on D1. And that's scummy.
Tell me that isn't the scummiest thing that's been said all game.
I'll admit it, that was pretty good.
How, then, was my vote a response to "pressure?" What "pressure" do you speak of?
Taking five questions at once is a lot of pressure, and a lot of exposure for a shifty person like you to try and deal with. Looking back, you're right: no one was directly accusing or voting you. But for a player with more than one game under their belt, I find it interesting that your first vote out of the gate was a bandwagon on poor, language-hampered (feigned or not), vulnerable mark.
Vodot, I am quite aware of my vote being cast and the implication, but my vote was not unjustified, nor is it currently bandwagoning because Shakerag changed his vote. I have not. I declared unjustified bandwagoning to be superscum earlier, to boot... It'd be pretty hilarious if I started unjustified bandwagoning so soon after such a declaration.
But bandwagoning is all about timing, and when you cast the vote, it WAS bandwagoning.
Yes, or No? And RE:Your potential hypocrisy, I agree, and I'd have to chuckle about it. Kind of like I am now, actually.
Now, the misinformation I am concerned about is your...agressive? interogation style. You are fingering everybody when at this stage of the game, such an aggressive approach does nothing but draw attention to yourself.
Ick, ick. I'll agree that it draws attention to myself, but only because there is a vacuum of other interrogation going on. The rest of what you said is just slimy and gross. Read the IC posts, or read through a few of the other games, please.
So, Vodot, I have a question for you: d2. You examine someone, and they are guilty. However, you -may- be playing with a bastard mod. Do you trust your results?
...No...? I might not be familiar with bastard mod (unreliable narrator, right?), but that just seems like a pointless question to me. "A potentially unreliable person gives you information. Do you trust it?"
Am I missing a wrinkle here,
Wrex, or
are you just asking a question to ask a question?