I've lost track of what we're actually trying to resolve here
The root of what I am trying to get across, is this.
I do not believe Mr. Krahulik is a bigot, just ignorant. When someone says something as monumentally stupid as "[only] women have vaginas and [only] men have a penis" they're either ignorant or transphobic. There's no real room for anything else. Mr. Krahulik does not really strike me as transphobic so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and just assume he's ignorant.
The bolded parts are things you added to the quote, he did not say that. And there is a huge difference between saying only and not saying only. The italicized parts are where I believe you are sorta wrong.
It's the difference between maliciousness/massive stupidity and a seriously understandable mistake. But, the information given in this thread and that I have found though light searching does not show what it was.
Your post leaves no alternative, he is ignorant, or he is malicious. And quite frankly, eliminating any other possible interpretation you have left out or bent the truth.
That is what I have a issue with, of course, by the time I actually read your post, it was already quite a bit past the point where I could bring myself to care. But then it was brought back up again by someone else as the truth. Which I objected to.
Not totally sure if I'm answering what you want.
I don't so much want anything from you in particular so much to present a alternative viewpoint that was eliminated from this thread by falsehoods instead of truths.