Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 88

Author Topic: Nitpicks that Ruined Movies  (Read 135064 times)

kaijyuu

  • Bay Watcher
  • Hrm...
    • View Profile
Re: Nitpicks that Ruined Movies
« Reply #105 on: July 29, 2012, 03:09:45 am »

Hey, people with the ability to help others certainly have the responsibility to, but that's pushing it. There's no reason to believe the humans wouldn't cut and burn Pandora and make it just as much a hellhole as they did Earth. Even if the blue space aliens had the ability to save Earth, there's no reason to believe the humans wouldn't accepted it.

Remember the wise old shaman lady saying they can't teach someone who's "cup is already full"? If humanity's screwed, they screwed themselves over, and there's nothing the blue people could've done to change that.
Logged
Quote from: Chesterton
For, in order that men should resist injustice, something more is necessary than that they should think injustice unpleasant. They must think injustice absurd; above all, they must think it startling. They must retain the violence of a virgin astonishment. When the pessimist looks at any infamy, it is to him, after all, only a repetition of the infamy of existence. But the optimist sees injustice as something discordant and unexpected, and it stings him into action.

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: Nitpicks that Ruined Movies
« Reply #106 on: July 29, 2012, 03:10:37 am »

Not evil? While amorality != immorality, it's hard to argue that the former can't be evil.

Genocide and destruction wasn't their goal, no, but they considered it an acceptable cost. Preeeety sure that falls under evil.
You want to talk about genocide? Humanity in Avatar needs unobtainium for FTL, which is in turn used to transport resources and Pandoran biology back to Earth, which is in turn keeping the planet and the people on it from collapsing into apocalyptic chaos. The Na'vi, on the other hand, completely refuse to cooperate and randomly decided to start killing the RDA personnel on sight from the advice of their God-Emperor-Tree-Thing. The actions they take present an existential threat to humanity. They would have gotten off lucky being bombed into retreat, and thanks to traitor extraordinary Jake Sully everyone on Earth is doomed.

Colonel Quartich is the true hero of Avatar and the attempted savior of all humankind, betrayed at the darkest hour by his most trusted follower.

Nope. Backstory tells us otherwise. Unobtanium is needed for FTL, but it is also the only resource brought back to Earth. Bringing back Pandoran biology is
A) Biology fail (No Biochemical barriers)
B) One of the stupidest thing you can do to a weakened ecosystem is bringing in exotic plants. Pandora is on semi Quarantine for that reason.
The backstory(and extended DVD version) tells us that Earth is slowly regaining it's ecosystem thanks to governement (No RDA involved) funded cloning programs. The unobtanium is only needed for energy production (Cheap fusion reactors) and the global maglev network. It is at no point stated and there's no reason to think that unobtanium is needed for human survival. Sure it would make live easier for us on our dying planet, but it isn't needed.

Which brings me to another minor plothole. Does, at any point in the movie, someone attempt to explain to the Na Vi why we're clear cutting the forest ?
« Last Edit: July 29, 2012, 03:12:58 am by 10ebbor10 »
Logged

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: Nitpicks that Ruined Movies
« Reply #107 on: July 29, 2012, 03:13:11 am »

The backstory also tells you that the government cloning programs work because of study into Pandoran biology. Where did you think the Avatar Program came from?

Being that Earth is dying and all, cheap fusion energy and FTL are not luxuries, they are a necessity for the planet's recovery.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: Nitpicks that Ruined Movies
« Reply #108 on: July 29, 2012, 03:20:24 am »

The backstory also tells you that the government cloning programs work because of study into Pandoran biology. Where did you think the Avatar Program came from?

Being that Earth is dying and all, cheap fusion energy and FTL are not luxuries, they are a necessity for the planet's recovery.

Where have you read that. The backstory explicitily states that the Avatar amnio tanks are adapted from technology that is widespread on Earth. In fact, the thing also reffers to a whole lot of experiments on mamalian creatures that didn't need to be preformed on the avatar versions.

Fusion technology also works without unobtanium, as is evidenced by the widespread RDA lunar He-3 operation and by the sheer widespreadness of fusion engines*, which predates the discovery of Pandora. It doesn't help that we're not told why the unobtanium is so valuable, and that the wiki's article on unobtanium is blank.

*Even the mining systems run on fusion for example.

As for FTL being needed.
     1. FTL doesn't exist in the Avatar verse
     2. The only target for the ISV's to go to is Pandora, they ain't going anywhere else, and in fact, can't go anywhere else.
Logged

Neyvn

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Logged
Quote from: Ubiq
Broker: Wasn't there an ambush squad here just a second ago?
Merchant: I don't know what you're talking about. Do you want this goblin ankle bone amulet or not?
My LIVESTREAM. I'm Aussie, so not everything is clean. Least it works...

miauw62

  • Bay Watcher
  • Every time you get ahead / it's just another hit
    • View Profile
Re: Nitpicks that Ruined Movies
« Reply #110 on: July 29, 2012, 04:08:24 am »

A cracked article, iirc. Lemme see if I can find it.


EDIT: Can not find it. Alas.

I do remember the context, though. And probably not cracked, now that I think about it. It was about how some diseases aid in their propagation by affecting your behavior. Beyond the flu, the most obvious virus that makes you do stuff would be rabies; it doesn't make you aggressive out of pure happenstance.
There's also this parasite taht normally alterates between cats and mice, and makes mice attracted to cats so cats can get the parasite again. Can also get to humans, btw.
Logged

Quote from: NW_Kohaku
they wouldn't be able to tell the difference between the raving confessions of a mass murdering cannibal from a recipe to bake a pie.
Knowing Belgium, everyone will vote for themselves out of mistrust for anyone else, and some kind of weird direct democracy coalition will need to be formed from 11 million or so individuals.

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: Nitpicks that Ruined Movies
« Reply #111 on: July 29, 2012, 04:11:37 am »

A cracked article, iirc. Lemme see if I can find it.


EDIT: Can not find it. Alas.

I do remember the context, though. And probably not cracked, now that I think about it. It was about how some diseases aid in their propagation by affecting your behavior. Beyond the flu, the most obvious virus that makes you do stuff would be rabies; it doesn't make you aggressive out of pure happenstance.
There's also this parasite taht normally alterates between cats and mice, and makes mice attracted to cats so cats can get the parasite again. Can also get to humans, btw.
Toxoplamosis I think.

I might also affect human behaviour, btw.
Logged

Loud Whispers

  • Bay Watcher
  • They said we have to aim higher, so we dug deeper.
    • View Profile
    • I APPLAUD YOU SIRRAH
Re: Nitpicks that Ruined Movies
« Reply #112 on: July 29, 2012, 04:29:28 am »

I might also affect human behaviour, btw.
If by affect you mean "cause brain damage" yes

scriver

  • Bay Watcher
  • City streets ain't got much pity
    • View Profile
Re: Nitpicks that Ruined Movies
« Reply #113 on: July 29, 2012, 06:18:28 am »

Not evil in the sense that everyone thinks them to be. They got no reasons to genocide the Na'Vi , and therefore they don't.

Maybe not EVIL, but yeah, they're just as evil, or bad or immoral if you prefer, as any other imperialists throughout our history.
Logged
Love, scriver~

Vattic

  • Bay Watcher
  • bibo ergo sum
    • View Profile
Re: Nitpicks that Ruined Movies
« Reply #114 on: July 29, 2012, 06:41:10 am »

Spoiler: other thing (click to show/hide)
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Spoiler (click to show/hide)

There is one other thing that bugged me from Alien Resurrection.
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Logged
6 out of 7 dwarves aren't Happy.
How To Generate Small Islands

Flare

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Nitpicks that Ruined Movies
« Reply #115 on: July 29, 2012, 07:29:11 am »

And why does everyone assume the spaceship that brought them there is also military and loaded with guns? And even if it was, why would it be loaded with nukes? I think these suppose plot holes, are just inventing plot holes.

If I was the chairman of that corporation, I''d probably load them up with some guns, and put in some share-holder nukes along with it. I mean, if you were going to go to a planet that potentially holds life forms, there might be a chance you need to kill them all. There are many other scenarios where the ship might need to defend itself even without the probability of unknown aliens fighting back.  In any case, arming your ships seems like a pretty good idea given how far away from reinforcements the ship will be when it reaches Pandora, you're not exactly conducting a mining operation within the umbrella of any sort of state apparatus.

As for nukes, I would think they would be much more plentiful in an age where FTL travel to other stars is feasible given the power requirements of FTL as well as the substantial danger it poses to earth that dwarfs nukes. The ships probably are carrying a reactor of some sort, if not several in case one fails. The power generation requirements needed to mine out whole mountains are similarly huge, especially when you have so few people around it suggests a great deal of the grunt work would be done by machines, so you probably need a reactor for that too unless you're planning to dig or carry all the fossil fuels for the whole operation.
Logged

MrWillsauce

  • Bay Watcher
  • Has an ass that won't quit
    • View Profile
Re: Nitpicks that Ruined Movies
« Reply #116 on: July 29, 2012, 07:32:00 am »

A lot of stuff in the new Batman movie broke my immersion. I thought it was a decent movie overall, but there are a few things about it I can't ignore.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Logged

kaijyuu

  • Bay Watcher
  • Hrm...
    • View Profile
Re: Nitpicks that Ruined Movies
« Reply #117 on: July 29, 2012, 07:38:12 am »

Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Logged
Quote from: Chesterton
For, in order that men should resist injustice, something more is necessary than that they should think injustice unpleasant. They must think injustice absurd; above all, they must think it startling. They must retain the violence of a virgin astonishment. When the pessimist looks at any infamy, it is to him, after all, only a repetition of the infamy of existence. But the optimist sees injustice as something discordant and unexpected, and it stings him into action.

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: Nitpicks that Ruined Movies
« Reply #118 on: July 29, 2012, 07:45:00 am »

If I were the secretary of the UN, and a corporation whose fundings exceeds that of several nations, and that employs people such as Lovecraft (Inventor of the Dark dreamer project, which became the avatar project) wanted to design a spaceship with weapon capabilities and equip it with nukes, and send that to an alien planet, of which the only intelligent live lies on stone age levels, I'd sure as hell withdraw that mining license* and dismantle the compagny if I could.

The first mission to Pandora was done at great expense, using a 4 km ship. Considering the enormous energy costs involved, there would be no space for redundant features such as weaponry. After that they knew about the Na'vi, and using nukes and orbital weaponry against stone age people seems a bit redundant, doesn't it. Especially when you are having serious PR problems already, and your ship only has a 350 metric tonnes of cargo capacity. (Which isn't a lot on astronomical scales, believe me)

*The RDA was only permitted the right to mine the planet after PETA screwed up their campaign. Turns out using a human with implants as Na' Vi was a bad idea.

Last but not Least:

THERE IS NO FTL TRAVEL IN AVATAR (0.7 c is fast, but not FTL)

The only star they can reach is alpha Centauri, and that only at great expense. All power generation is done by fusion (excepts for the ships main drive, which is an antimatter/matter reactor). Unlike fission, fusion can not be brought to explode. Besides, since fission is barely used anymore, the amount of nuclear weapons would most likely be less, not more. Antimatter/matter reactors being as dangerous as they are, I expect them to be strongly guarded. The deuterium and he 3 required for fusionpower on Pandora are gathered from the gas giant around which the ship flies, using retired shuttles.
Logged

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: Nitpicks that Ruined Movies
« Reply #119 on: July 29, 2012, 07:52:28 am »

ALso, I just found this on the Pandorapedia

Quote
More powerful than most Earth governments. The Resources Development Administration (RDA) has monopoly rights to all products shipped, derived or developed from Pandora and any other off-Earth location. These rights were granted to RDA in perpetuity by the Interplanetary Commerce Administration (ICA), with the stipulation that they abide by a treaty that prohibits weapons of mass destruction and limits military power in space.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 88