UI:
Toaster: You're not sure if your top suspect is voteworthy? Are you serious?
I thought this over, and I might as well claim it- something bad happens to the last person I vote for (regardless if I'm actually voting them at the time), and I had rather it happen to ZU than Hapah. In retrospect, it was pretty silly since he was due to hang anyway. Additionally, something good happens to me if I end the day not voting. (Usually I'd rather vote, but there was no way Hapah was going to hang. I'm even less sure of him now, though.)
Tiruin:
Toaster
I want explanations on --snipped quote--
Because it seems that you hit the 'bad town' mark on ZU and only that from Hapah's post. Did you say anything about other alignments? I don't see em.
I want ZU to die at night rather than hang because I think he's a jester.
What do you think about flailing players and how they can benefit the game?
Also,
...I actually consider myself a poor D1 player, especially in bigger (13+) games. I usually spend the day muddling around cluelessly until I have multiple days of data to work with.
Does this work in any which way for your alignment?
What did you expect me to say about other alignments? If he's scum, he's good to hang; otherwise he is bad to hang. Additionally, see above response to UI- that post was cleverly constructed to move my "last voted" effect to ZU without actually voting him.
Flailing players are bad, but if they have played well in the past (ZU has) then they're either doing on purpose or just having an attack of idiocy.
As far as my D1 play, it's always pretty much the same.
Hapah: What do you make of ZU's town flip?
Dariush: You say we notice some are "worse for wear." Can we tell which ones?