So far I've left all ADJ_DIST at 2 because I'd imagine we'll need to experiment to see what looks best here.Agreed. I'm not sure this is even relevant in-game as of now. Past research shows the count goes up to five
THat's five places for Adjectives.... The red delicious fallen halved spicy apple.
Not sure where that comes up in play. In the RAWs two is certainly the average.
How are we dealing with terms that only relate to specific real world religions? (like mass).There are many already in the RAW file. Fill them out and we can deal with any problems from duplication of definitions as we find them.
How do we deal with verbs or nouns that haven't certain tenses?I'm not sure the RAWs have an example. Repeat the Prsent and Past.
[VERB:may:maybe:might:might:maybe:] if through testing it's found to be a problem we can remove the words and test them not being there.
Can we have adverbs?I think they are made with the [PREFIX:] tags
What to do with words with multiple meanings? The dwarven spelling would be different likely.Separate each defination out if it makes sense to do so. The [WORD:] tag is just a call flagto that specific deffinition.
We can safely have [WORD:BAT_Animal] and [WORD:BAT_SPORT]
Dwarves and Elve may not use the same word for flying mammals and sporting clubs.
Keep and Harbor were hard cases I found. But
to keep or
to harbor easily translate back to the noun forms.
These a kept as one word definition
but I could have broke them up as.
[WORD:HARBOR] -=- [WORD:TO_HARBOR]
[WORD:KEEP] -=- [WORD:TO_KEEP]
FinallyThanks for the notes. Words that are duplicates of any other entry will need to be removed.
Second I trust your judgement on tags in the end. If you think it sounds right. That is enough for me.
The rules are there to make people aware of what problems exist. English is too complicated to try and hold fast to a single standard.