I'm going to disagree, most of his threads, pretty much all of them, are just random nonsense mush. They get like a few random replies then die, I don't see how that's interesting to be honest. Except maybe the first time you see one and try to engage only to find out that there's no point in doing so. But they are pretty much all the same after the first. And to me, they make bay12 harder to browse by pushing actually interesting threads down and harder to immediately notice and access. So, for me, his threads make bay12 less interesting, and whenever we're deep into a spam storm where like half the front page is his bullshit I pretty much stop browsing general discussion for a bit until it blows over.
Pretty much the only thread of his with any actual content (not added by him of course, but other people) is the AI thread, which is still random nonsense mush, but at least hit at a time when interest in AI is at an upswing, and thus people stuck around, ignored what he said, and had an actual conversation. But, for the same reason that it survived, that interest in AI, I'd argue that if he didn't post it we'd probably still have a thread with discussion about AI ongoing in it. Might even be better with a more reasonable first post (although I'll admit I doubt that one matters much if at all
)
Edit: Also this really doesn't matter, but I'm struggling to get over your use of the word "Sub" Jipehog. I guess it's technically an accurate thing to say, given that this is a "sub"forum. But I don't think I've ever seen anyone say it that way, and I think that most of the time when someone is talking about a "sub" in regards to social media they are talking about a subreddit. Noticeably, this is not me saying you should stop saying sub, I just find it very interesting that you do and it puzzles me a little bit.