Toaster:Book: I was, indeed, disabled N1. I left it out to potentially catch fakeclaims. Also, what was your submission?
But you
weren't disabled N1, you were disabled D2 & N2; N1 you were protected. Why do you claim differently? How would leaving it out help catch fakeclaims?
My submission was "disabler", which I hadn't seen before, and ended up not working at all as I thought it would. Wuba added the doctor bit.
Your attack on Leafsnail is unclear. Please give an approximation of the percentage each of the following contributes to your vote on him:
Nexus inconsistency
Replacement request
Scummy comments he has made
Any other reasons not covered above (specify)
Mostly the Nexus inconsistency, though he has explained that well. His replacement request seemed fishy in light of that and consistent with being scum, but he has explained that too, the wily bastard. He hasn't seemed scummy in his comments, keeping his nose quite clean.
Leafsnail:I perhaps didn't stress this point enough, but
Basically, I can either sacrifice myself at night to prevent all other kills and revive[...] or I can do nothing and have all abilities targetting me target a random person instead.
I attempted to use my martyrdom ability, so my nexus power would have been inactive.
Fair enough.
Nor do I have the ability to travel back in time 2 weeks and talk about this holiday.
Heh. Forgot about that. Fair as well. Have fun in Greece.
Unvote.I'm still undecided whether lynching or nolynching today is wiser. The risk that Tiruin managed to delay the mafiakill is there, or it may have happened and been targeted on Leafsnail, who was protected (wuba confirms that neither the target nor I would know if the protection triggered), or the scum could have been disabled or chosen not to kill for a number of reasons.
My main scum suspicion returns to
Imiknorris, for previous reasons, plus his readiness to jump on the daykill of Tiruin (which made sense, but would be compatible with his stated use of the daykill as scum, and seemed a bit overanxious about it).
Toaster is also suspect due to the inconsistencies of the disabled claim I pointed above, and his being disabled N2 would explain the lack of kill then (not the lack of kill N1, but other combinations of actions would).
I'm not ready to vote either just yet, though. I'd prefer if both he and Toaster talked more about their actions and reads.